Click Here to Register for TheWrap.com Screening Series
Complete Awards Season Coverage

AOL Leaps Into Original News Content With PoliticsDaily.com

AOL will launch PoliticsDaily.com in April with veteran political journalists Melinda Henneberger and Carl Cannon, moving the portal toward becoming a producer of traditional news.

EMAIL
PRINT

Related

Keywords

Slideshow

“As the site becomes more of a brand and more successful, you may see us begin to move more into [breaking] news coverage, but we don’t see that as the wise place to start.”

 

Hennerger said the site will aim for good writing. "People have thought there's one way to do it on the web and that’s to dominate the ten-second news cycle. We are gambling there's another audience that wants you to step back, for maybe a day, and do thoughtful analysis pieces that are heavily reported."


At Yahoo, the company’s recent strategy has been to identify an audience need, then fill it, with shows like “Prime Time in No Time,” a humorous daily round-up of prime-time shows that averages 400,000 daily streams, and the upcoming celebrity mom show “Spotlight to Nightlight.”


That approach could be translated into more traditional news content, as well -- perhaps erasing memories of the last push Yahoo made into becoming a major entertainment news content creator several years ago, which was eventually scaled back. 


Over at Google, the cultural barriers to becoming a producer of news, rather than just a technology company that works with news outlets to distribute news, are steeper.  For years the company has held dear the dogma that it does not produce media content.


“We are a technology company, not a media company,” said Google spokesperson Jennie Johnston. “The tremendous amount of expertise that goes into news gathering, editors, journalists – it’s not something we have to be good at.’’ 


The focus across Google is instead on working with news organizations: “We want to help newspapers distribute their content online, engage their readers better.” Google’s ethos is to “create – but not be creative,” as Johnston put it. It’s an appealing model, and you can’t argue much with the results.


Still, the lure of the potentially lucrative gap opening up as traditional news organizations radically downsize could be hard to resist.  And the chance for someone like Schmidt to be a white knight -- in this case, to appear to “save” journalism – might prove irresistible. When Schmidt floated the idea of buying the New York Times a year ago, there was an almost universal outpouring of joy at the prospect.

 

There are doubters, of course. Given the culture clash between technology people and news people, “Google is not going to successfully build a news organization,” said Michael Wolff, whose own news site, newser.com had 1.7 million unique visitors last month. “But can they profitably buy something, that’s a different question. If Google were to give any news organization its traffic, that’s the way to create a category killer.” (See accompanying Q&A with Michael Wolff.)


In the meantime, the “news ecosystem” that’s emerging in the digital era will consist of much more than simply content created by huge companies. News now means professionals and amateurs, newspapers and nonprofits, Twitter, blogs and Flickr streams, with aggregators and RSS feeds and tools like Google Reader to sort it all out. 


(At the South by Southwest festival this weekend, complementary pieces on the teeming digital news landscape by new media seers Clay Shirky and Steven Johnson were much discussed and Twittered-about among the media set.

Previous
1 | 2 | 3
Next

Comments

Yes, David Higgins is just as malodorous as he seems.games

I wonder if the relations with Politicsdaily will remain the same as AOL is now split from Time Warner

AOL finally is doing news. It had resisted it for so long with its reliance on repurposing stories from wire services. Now will it hire a diverse staff or just friends of their friends.

So Ted Turner didn't have enough news outlets controlled by Obama?
He had to add a new one?

By the way, folks, by "original journalism" they mean "making-it-up" journalism. You know, fiction. Propaganda. The fascist ObamaGarbage you can read on Huffington Post and dozens of other party propaganda outlets.

So why read it when you can get the talking points directly from Fuehrer Obama?

Yes, David Higgins is just as malodorous as he seems.

Brock, you may have been the chief Washington correspondent but you still can't spell... "It's" is a contraction of "It is"... There is no apostophe of possession in "Its reporters".

I was the Chief Washington Correspondent for MSNBC.com for the first 10 years of the organization's existence. I guarantee you MSNBC.com cranks out original journalism on a daily basis. It's reporters break stories, scooping their media partners on a regular basis.

But it's a huge team of reporters, a dozen or so, backed by an army of editors and multimedia producers that keep the site pumping with content from all its other partners.

MSNBC.com has won many journalism awards (I won two of them myself while on staff). I'd put the reporting skills of MSNBC.com up against any newsroom in the country.

And the MSNBC.com have to work doubly hard; imagine having to compete on a story with reporters in your own house; many times MSNBC.com reporters are covering stories that reporters from the NY Times or Washington Post are covering (though they try and steer clear of most pack reporting.)

And, oh yeah, when I left, well... they went out and hired a Pulitzer Prize winner to take my place.

I rest my case.

First of all, you don't know the first thing. MSNBC is a TV channel, while msnbc.com is a Web site. Different companies.

Second, while it does carry video from NBC and MSNBC (its corporate cousins), as well as partners such as NYTimes and WashPost and Newsweek, msnbc.com also has what cnn.com and AOL have never had: two newsrooms with journalists doing original reporting. It has reporters on health, business, sports, a team doing investigative projects, technology, consumer issues, breaking news, etc.

MSNBC is a news/web portal; not original news provider. Look at their sources.

Hasn't msnbc.com been doing original journalism for years? (Which is why it's number 1 in news.) You make it sound as if three reporters at AOL is something new.

NEW COMMENT

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <i> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Comments

Yes, David Higgins is just as malodorous as he seems.games

I wonder if the relations with Politicsdaily will remain the same as AOL is now split from Time Warner

AOL finally is doing news. It had resisted it for so long with its reliance on repurposing stories from wire services. Now will it hire a diverse staff or just friends of their friends.

So Ted Turner didn't have enough news outlets controlled by Obama?
He had to add a new one?

By the way, folks, by "original journalism" they mean "making-it-up" journalism. You know, fiction. Propaganda. The fascist ObamaGarbage you can read on Huffington Post and dozens of other party propaganda outlets.

So why read it when you can get the talking points directly from Fuehrer Obama?

Yes, David Higgins is just as malodorous as he seems.

Brock, you may have been the chief Washington correspondent but you still can't spell... "It's" is a contraction of "It is"... There is no apostophe of possession in "Its reporters".

I was the Chief Washington Correspondent for MSNBC.com for the first 10 years of the organization's existence. I guarantee you MSNBC.com cranks out original journalism on a daily basis. It's reporters break stories, scooping their media partners on a regular basis.

But it's a huge team of reporters, a dozen or so, backed by an army of editors and multimedia producers that keep the site pumping with content from all its other partners.

MSNBC.com has won many journalism awards (I won two of them myself while on staff). I'd put the reporting skills of MSNBC.com up against any newsroom in the country.

And the MSNBC.com have to work doubly hard; imagine having to compete on a story with reporters in your own house; many times MSNBC.com reporters are covering stories that reporters from the NY Times or Washington Post are covering (though they try and steer clear of most pack reporting.)

And, oh yeah, when I left, well... they went out and hired a Pulitzer Prize winner to take my place.

I rest my case.

First of all, you don't know the first thing. MSNBC is a TV channel, while msnbc.com is a Web site. Different companies.

Second, while it does carry video from NBC and MSNBC (its corporate cousins), as well as partners such as NYTimes and WashPost and Newsweek, msnbc.com also has what cnn.com and AOL have never had: two newsrooms with journalists doing original reporting. It has reporters on health, business, sports, a team doing investigative projects, technology, consumer issues, breaking news, etc.

MSNBC is a news/web portal; not original news provider. Look at their sources.

Hasn't msnbc.com been doing original journalism for years? (Which is why it's number 1 in news.) You make it sound as if three reporters at AOL is something new.

NEW COMMENT

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <i> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options