"Bill Moyers Journal" will end with April 30 edition.
Ad Buyers to TV Execs: We Have The Upper Hand
Two months after the upfront presentations, no advertising deals have been made.
In a normal year, TV networks will meet with advertisers shortly after showing off their new fall schedules in May, they’ll demand big price increases on their commercial time, the ad guys will pay up, and everyone will go on vacation.
But this isn't a normal year.
Major TV advertisers GM and Chrysler are entering Chapter 11, and NBC experimenting with a latenight show at 10 p.m. And, of course, there's the recession.
Indeed, it’s the week after July 4, and the “upfront” -- the negotiation period when broadcast and cable networks sell the bulk of their commercial time for the coming TV season -- hasn’t even started yet.
On Tuesday, reports surfaced that NBC was in advanced talks with media agency Group M for a flurry of advertising deals.
Consummating a deal would probably spark the broader upfront market into action, with the better-performing CBS, Fox and ABC networks waiting for NBC to establish some form of pricing benchmark before entering negotiations with advertisers themselves. But no deal has been announced yet.
So what’s been the holdup?
“There’s unprecedented uncertainty regarding the directions of audiences, advertisers and media purveyors,” said John Rash, who negotiates for advertisers on behalf of media agency Campbell Mithun.
Currently locked in several stalemates of his own with TV networks, that’s Rash’s way of saying that there are myriad factors keeping this year’s dealing from getting started.
For one, media agency operatives say it’s an acutely buyer’s market this year, and they have felt no need to rush into negotiations as they have previously.
In a typical year, media buyers are quick to secure what they perceive as a scarce resource, that is commercial time for popular prime-time shows like “American Idol” and “The Mentalist” -- programs that can do what few other media entities still can, that is, draw audiences in excess of 10 million.
In fact, often times, media agencies buy commercial time without having a firm fix on just how much money their clients have to spend, or what it is exactly the networks will have on next fall.
“There were so many years where it was a seller’s market, and the agencies didn’t have a lot of time to get all their ducks in a row,” said one media buyer. “We kind of had the luxury this year of, No. 1, figuring out our clients’ budgets, and No. 2, requesting detailed plans from the networks.”
Meanwhile, with media buyers initially demanding double-digit-percentage price rollbacks on commercial time, the big broadcast networks -- which typically consummate their upfront deals ahead of cable networks and syndicators -- have bided their time, too.
In recent upfronts, the networks have typically secured price increases in the low teen range on CPMs, that is, the cost of a thousand viewer impressions. Last year, these CPM increases were in the single-digit range, with Fox getting as much as a 9% increase for some of their inventory amid an upfront that would exceed $17 billion combined for broadcast and cable networks.
This year, early talks had buyers demanding price decreases in the range of 10% and above.
“The networks are almost fighting for their lives,” said Jack Feuer, a former executive editor for Ad Week who now writes the Media X column for the ad-business-targeted website Mediapost.



Comments
denne Says
@Unindicted Co-Conspirator, just be thankful it's only 2 pages and not 10 like forbes.com (and many others), which yes, I also refuse to read. sites need to watch that line very closely when splitting pages up for impressions...
P.S. while we're on site design, the Wrap captcha is annoying and discourages me from commenting.
adwatcher Says
Daniel Frankel and Feuer:
All I know is that your sub hed says that 2 months after the upfront presentations, no deals have been made, which is out and out false. The ad trades have been reporting on product placement deals and some small cable deals for the last two weeks.
As for "nuance," I don't mean to say that you have to write with such detail that the story bores your audience, but to say that nothing in the upfront is black and white. Jack, with all your experience, you ought to know that. There are deals being done, there are conversations being had, and some ground has been ceded over price. Thats detail your audience might like to have.
And Im sorry: John Rash may be a great guy, and very knowledgeable. But oftentimes the most widely quoted people are those with the least to lose. Had you quoted someone from one of the bigger firms, I think your piece would have more authority
Daniel Frankel Says
Adwatcher:
Although they requested that their names not be put in this story, we also had several other media buyers from bigname agencies with Madison Avenue addresses quoted in this story. And yes, John Rash is based in the Midwest, but I'm not sure there's a more asstute commentator on programming and broadcast negotiations. And as for Mr. Feuer, he still does a great job of writing about the advertising business for Mediapost. As for the missing "nuance" of the story, it is targeted to a general entertainment business audience. My first priority is to make the language and concepts understandable to that audience, which may or may not read "Ad Age."
Feuer Says
Dear Adwatcher;
What are you, an actor or something? A derivatives trader? I doubt anybody in the business would refer to it as a "sector" (which is an inaccurate description anyway).
John Rash is one of the most widely quoted and respected thinkers on media buying in America.
And I am....well, Google me, dipstick. I've been called many things--I bet you're thinking some of them right now--but inactive ain't one of 'em.
Speaking of which, people also have called the upfront many things but never "nuanced." Not with a straight face, anyway.
I'd love to hear what "nuance" you missed from the story. Perhaps a Michael Jackson reference?
adwatcher Says
Your sourcing on this is third-rate: A former trade journalist no longer actively covering the sector and an executive at a small midwest ad agency that doesn't specialize in media buying and doesn't have the bulk power to drive deals?
The facts are these: Yes, the market is largely stalled. But NBC has been doing business and there are plenty of conversations going on between both sides. You need more nuance to give an accurate portrayal of what's going on
Sharon Waxman Says
dear unindicted - there is no requirement at thewrap to read page two. but we do think it's worth the journey. please stick with us, s.
Unindicted Co-Conspirator Says
Will you get rid of this idiotic & asinine two page format?
Totally ridiculous & really annoying.
I absolutely refuse to go to any ABC.com or Reuters.com story because of that!
NEW COMMENT