Click Here to Register for TheWrap.com Screening Series
Complete Awards Season Coverage

Weinstein, Tarantino Ride Into Battle at Cannes

Deja vu ... Harvey and Bob hit town with rumors of funding woes, and "Inglourious Basterds" could put them on firm ground.

EMAIL
PRINT

Related

Keywords

Slideshow

At the Weinstein Company penthouse party in Cannes on Tuesday evening, the champagne flowed from magnums, the breeze blew gently over the marble terrace, and Harvey Weinstein sported his leaner, post-Miramax physique beside a fetching Marion Cotillard.
 
All seemed flush in the house of Bob and Harvey, despite the rumors of their imminent demise that lately have risen to a fever pitch.
 
The company, say the rumormongers, has run out of capital. There is no cash to release fall movies like “Youth in Revolt.” Weinstein has been serially seen in the company of billionaires, desperate to raise more funds to replenish the $1.2 billion he has raised -- and apparently spent so far, without a blockbuster hit in sight.
 
Even Weinstein company executives acknowledge the rumors are rampant.
 
That only makes the Cannes debut on Wednesday of Quentin Tarantino’s World War II magnum opus, “Inglourious Basterds,” all the more significant.
 
Fifteen years ago at this same festival, Tarantino made a sensation of “Pulp Fiction,” a movie that went on to gross more than $200 million at the box office and to make Miramax, as Weinstein has so often said, “the house that Quentin built.”
 
It remain to be seen whether “Basterds,” at two hours and forty minutes, with a $70 million budget several times that of “Pulp Fiction” and half-owned by Universal, can perform the same miracle.

 

The movie played for a mob-like press corps on Wednesday morning, and Tarantino - surrounded by his cast, including Brad Pitt and Mike Myers - seemed to be floating on air. (See Waxword Cannes for more from the press conference.)

But heavenly intervention may well be on the way from elsewhere.
 
At the cocktail party, Weinstein showed a two-minute montage from “Nine,” a star-studded new musical by “Chicago” director Rob Marshall -- with Penelope Cruz, Kate Hudson, Nicole Kidman, Cotillard and Daniel Day Lewis -- that has clearly boosted the company’s confidence. (See accompanying list of upcoming Weinstein Co. releases.)
 
Hudson dances, Cruz sings, Kidman poses dramatically and the always-Oscar-bait Lewis does it all. 
 
If the film is as good as the montage and trailer (it’s not finished), Weinstein may have a path to the blockbuster hit that has so far eluded him and his brother, and a way past the rocky shoals that continually threaten to take the company down.
 
“This is a thumbs-up, thumbs-down year for the company,” said a senior executive from another independent film company. If ‘Basterds’ does well, it won’t be a new lease on life, but it will be proof of concept. By New Year’s, it will be ‘pop the champagne,’ or else -- “the reverse."
 
Another rival film executive was more skeptical: “If ‘Inglourious’ is a misfire, it’ll hurt them ... If it’s a hit, I don’t know if it’ll save them.”
 
Weinstein declined to be interviewed for this article.

 
1 | 2 | 3
Next

Comments

Get the facts. The Brothers no longer own majority stake in Genius Products. They only own about 15 to 20% now after having to sell for a very cheap price.

I'm sorry, but Weinstein deserves to lose his company. How do you throw away a film like Crossing Over, which headlined Harrison Ford, Jim Sturgess, Ashley Judd, Ray Liotta and Sean Penn (which he cut out)? Even if the film was the biggest piece of shit (and it wasn't - but I suspect the original version was longer and more fleshed out before Harvey got his hands on it), it's freaking HARRISON FORD and you could have marketed that film as a Harrison Ford political thriller and had a decent opening weekend. But Weinstein only released it in something like 30 theaters and it was gone after a week or two. And how do you cut Sean Penn, post Oscar win, out of a film (supposedly at Penn's request due to politically correctness)? Dumb and dumber. You don't frickin' platform a Harrison Ford film.

And what about Outlander - another cool, sci-fi film that any other distributor would have milked into a decent opening. Or Killshot, which was released in even fewer theaters than Crossing Over. It's all about marketing and these guys are freaking oblivious; they seek out the lowest common denominator with their every move and have no cash left to get the word out. Have you see The Road trailer with all that phony disaster footage in the beginning? What a joke. I swear, any other distributor would have made millions off all the above films, including Zak and Miri. I love Tarantino's films, but he should've dumped the Harvey baggage years ago.

This is a funny article. Do you even think Harvey would have given up half of the QT movie IF HE HAD ANY MONEY AT ALL? The funny thing is it was QT and Grindhouse that killed the company. The billionaires aren't giving him cash! And if you think NINE saves the company you are fing hilarious! It's a Euro theatre thingy that isn't even that well known.

NEW COMMENT

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <i> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Comments

Get the facts. The Brothers no longer own majority stake in Genius Products. They only own about 15 to 20% now after having to sell for a very cheap price.

I'm sorry, but Weinstein deserves to lose his company. How do you throw away a film like Crossing Over, which headlined Harrison Ford, Jim Sturgess, Ashley Judd, Ray Liotta and Sean Penn (which he cut out)? Even if the film was the biggest piece of shit (and it wasn't - but I suspect the original version was longer and more fleshed out before Harvey got his hands on it), it's freaking HARRISON FORD and you could have marketed that film as a Harrison Ford political thriller and had a decent opening weekend. But Weinstein only released it in something like 30 theaters and it was gone after a week or two. And how do you cut Sean Penn, post Oscar win, out of a film (supposedly at Penn's request due to politically correctness)? Dumb and dumber. You don't frickin' platform a Harrison Ford film.

And what about Outlander - another cool, sci-fi film that any other distributor would have milked into a decent opening. Or Killshot, which was released in even fewer theaters than Crossing Over. It's all about marketing and these guys are freaking oblivious; they seek out the lowest common denominator with their every move and have no cash left to get the word out. Have you see The Road trailer with all that phony disaster footage in the beginning? What a joke. I swear, any other distributor would have made millions off all the above films, including Zak and Miri. I love Tarantino's films, but he should've dumped the Harvey baggage years ago.

This is a funny article. Do you even think Harvey would have given up half of the QT movie IF HE HAD ANY MONEY AT ALL? The funny thing is it was QT and Grindhouse that killed the company. The billionaires aren't giving him cash! And if you think NINE saves the company you are fing hilarious! It's a Euro theatre thingy that isn't even that well known.

NEW COMMENT

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <i> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options