Sign up for First Take, our daily insider email
Complete Awards Season Coverage

How to Save Network Television

How to Save Network Television

Five ways to make the TV production process more efficient.

EMAIL
PRINT

Related

Keywords

Slideshow

Even as they search for long-term solutions to what ails network TV, broadcast execs are also scrambling to find here-and-now fixes to their woes.

 

Slashing costs has been the order of the day ever since the 2007 writers strike ended. But now that budgets have been cut to the bone, suits are having to get creative.

 

TheWrap talked to numerous executives and agents and asked them what can be done to make the production process more efficient. Here are five possible improvements:

 

1. Stop the obsession on single-camera comedies and shift to multicamera half-hours.

Some agents say this is already happening as networks realize they're spending literally millions more per year on single-camera shows, even though three of the biggest comedy hits on TV are either multicamera or hybrid half-hours (all on CBS).


2. Give creative types a real, substantial stake in their shows.

Sure, anyone who creates a network comedy or drama typically gets a piece of the backend.

 

But unless you're already a big-name talent, it's usually a pretty tiny sliver, and the odds of you ever seeing any money are long once studio accountants work their "magic."

 

Why would networks save money by giving away potential profits?

 

"Because if you gave people a bigger stake financially, they'd do a good job of keeping costs under control," one top TV lit agent says. "Right now, they have no incentive to keep the costs down. But if someone owned 20 percent of a show, you can bet it's going to come in under budget."

 

3. Get rid of at least one layer of network/studio oversight of shows.

Right now, many showrunners have to deal with network notes, studio notes and sometimes even notes from non-writing producers.

 

Networks love to point out that 20 years ago, the staffs of most shows were much smaller than they are now.

 

"But what they never mention is that (writers back then) weren't getting grinded to death by current execs," one agent notes. "These companies all have so many layers of subjective notes. I was talking to one of my producers and he said to me, 'Should I be the one deciding what makes a good episode of (a series)'?"

 

Some networks have already done this by merging studio and network operations.

 

4. Step up investment in new technologies.

The producers of ABC's "V" recently assured reporters that the series would manage to maintain the high-quality look of its pilot in future episodes, even though series budgets are always smaller than pilot costs. The reason for the promise: ABC and Warner Bros. have given producers access to cutting-edge tools that allow producers to create and store virtual sets than can be used over and over again.

 

Such wizardry doesn't come cheap, but it the long-term, it maintains production values while reducing the cost of location filming.

 

5. Find a way to better harness talent found on the Internet.

Making the leap from the WWW to a network isn't easy, as the creators of "Quarter Life" discovered.

 
1 | 2
Next

Comments

I thought the other two parts of this series were bad...whoa boy. This article reminds me of the kind of useless fluff one reads in airline magazines or AAA's monthly treasure trove of sugar articles. "Find a better way to harness talent from the internet?" Huh? Hey Josef, want to boost your readership? "Just find a better way to write articles." Like, start with quoting actual people instead of generic references to imaginary friends, such as "one top TV lit agent."

As someone who's spent many years working in television production, this article smacks to me as having been written by someone who has never spent a day working in the business. Come on Josef, isn't that true?

Also, that Minnesota couple didn't wow me. Giving every "Joe the Plumber" who comes along every fifteen seconds "their own song and dance variety show" is exactly what's driving the networks out of business-by continuing to program mindless garbage!

My bad. Looking back on the article I see #1 was essentially "spend less more while also making more profitable shows".

I agree about the few extra sentences to get more ad impressions, though not on the bit about it being a good article. Less network staff, figure out some way to successfully transition internet hits to TV hits? These ideas are so generic to be beyond useless advice. I'm surprised #6 wasn't "spend less money while also make more profitable shows"

Good story but good you guys quit spanning articles an extra page for a couple sentences? It makes me think that you just want to get more ad impressions.

Teriffic read. This is biz really is changing.

Comments

I thought the other two parts of this series were bad...whoa boy. This article reminds me of the kind of useless fluff one reads in airline magazines or AAA's monthly treasure trove of sugar articles. "Find a better way to harness talent from the internet?" Huh? Hey Josef, want to boost your readership? "Just find a better way to write articles." Like, start with quoting actual people instead of generic references to imaginary friends, such as "one top TV lit agent."

As someone who's spent many years working in television production, this article smacks to me as having been written by someone who has never spent a day working in the business. Come on Josef, isn't that true?

Also, that Minnesota couple didn't wow me. Giving every "Joe the Plumber" who comes along every fifteen seconds "their own song and dance variety show" is exactly what's driving the networks out of business-by continuing to program mindless garbage!

My bad. Looking back on the article I see #1 was essentially "spend less more while also making more profitable shows".

I agree about the few extra sentences to get more ad impressions, though not on the bit about it being a good article. Less network staff, figure out some way to successfully transition internet hits to TV hits? These ideas are so generic to be beyond useless advice. I'm surprised #6 wasn't "spend less money while also make more profitable shows"

Good story but good you guys quit spanning articles an extra page for a couple sentences? It makes me think that you just want to get more ad impressions.

Teriffic read. This is biz really is changing.