A group of 13 creditors alleges a mountain of unpaid debts, and sue to take control in bankruptcy court
Lawsuits Fly Over Seagal Reality Show
After A&E sues...Genuine, Idea Factory go after cabler, ICM and Nick Reed.
Action movie star Steven Seagal's new reality television series has hit a legal snag in a dispute over the origination of the idea for the show.
In a federal lawsuit filed on Monday, A&E Television Networks has sued California-based Genuine over the production company's claim that A&E stole the concept for the show after both parties had several meetings.
Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, Genuine and the Idea Factory, Darryl Silver's production company that develops and produces reality TV programs, filed a suit of their own. They're suing Seagal, the actor's production company Steamroller Productions, A&E TV Network, International Creative Management and Seagal's ICM agent Nick Reed for fraud and breach of oral agreement.
The disputes revolve around the show "Steven Seagal: Lawman," which is currently slated to air on A&E later this year and includes segments depicting the actor's life as a deputy sheriff in Lousiana. Seagal gained fame in the 1990s with starring roles in films like "Under Siege."
In the lawsuit A&E filed, the network says the idea for the upcoming show is different from ideas about a reality show involving Seagal suggested by Genuine during meetings in 2007.
But Genuine's suit alleges that beginning in 2007, Seagal was introduced to Darryl Silver through Silver's brother, Scott, to discuss the possibility of doing a reality show with the Idea Factory.
After the meeting, Silver's company developed a number of different ideas for shows based around Seagal and when the two parties met they joined into an oral agreement stating that they planned to develop and co-produce his reality show together, sharing in executive producer and back-end fees.
During the meeting, Seagal also gave the Idea Factory exclusive rights to go out and "shop" the reality show to networks, the suit says.
But a few days after that discussion, Silver called up one of Seagal's business partners at the actor's production company who said he thought Seagal wouldn't actually follow through with the show. Seagal assured Silver he was still interested in the show and urged Silver to call Seagal's ICM agent, Nick Reed, to inform him of the plans.
Reed also told Silver he thought Seagal would never do the show, that reality TV would hurt Seagal's career and that Silver was on a "fool's errand," the suit says. Again, Seagal dismissed the skepticism and told Silver to move forward.
Meanwhile, VH-1, Court TV and A&E signaled interest in show ideas about contestants competing to become Seagal's new protege and co-star and another about Seagal's work as a sheriff's deputy in New Orleans.
But during negotiations with A&E, Silver got wind that someone else was also pitching a show about Seagal to the network. The suit alleges that Silver pitched the idea about Seagal in New Orleans to the network and they liked it so much they "begged" to kill interest from the other networks and were prepared to offer the actor $200,000 per episode.
Then between May and June 2008, Silver discovered that production company Granada America (represented by ICM) was in pre-production on a reality show about Segal's work in New Orleans.



Comments
mack10 Says
Greenhouse gases
Main articles: Greenhouse gas and Greenhouse effect
Greenhouse effect schematic showing energy flows between space, the atmosphere, and earth's surface. Energy exchanges are expressed in watts per square meter (W/m2).
Recent atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) increases. Monthly CO2 measurements display seasonal oscillations in overall yearly uptrend; each year's maximum occurs during the Northern Hemisphere's late spring, and declines during its growing season as plants remove some atmospheric CO2.The greenhouse effect is the process by which absorption and emission of infrared radiation by gases in the atmosphere warm a planet's lower atmosphere and surface. It was discovered by Joseph Fourier in 1824 and was first investigated quantitatively by Svante Arrhenius in 1896.[19] Existence of the greenhouse effect as such is not disputed, even by those who do not agree that the recent temperature increase is attributable to human activity. The question is instead how the strength of the greenhouse effect changes when human activity increases the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Naturally occurring greenhouse gases have a mean warming effect of about 33 °C (59 °F).[20][C] The major greenhouse gases are water vapor, which causes about 36–70 percent of the greenhouse effect; carbon dioxide (CO2), which causes 9–26 percent; methane (CH4), which causes 4–9 percent[not in citation given]; and ozone (O3), which causes 3–7 percent.[21][22] Clouds also affect the radiation balance, but they are composed of liquid water or ice and so are considered separately from water vapor and other gases.
Human activity since the Industrial Revolution has increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, leading to increased radiative forcing from CO2, methane, tropospheric ozone, CFCs and nitrous oxide. The concentrations of CO2 and methane have increased by 36% and 148% respectively since the mid-1700s.[23] These levels are much higher than at any time during the last 650,000 years, the period for which reliable data has been extracted from ice cores.[24] Less direct geological evidence indicates that CO2 values this high were last seen about 20 million years ago.[25] Fossil fuel burning has produced about three-quarters of the increase in CO2 from human activity over the past 20 years. Most of the rest is due to land-use change, particularly deforestation.[26]
CO2 concentrations are continuing to rise due to burning of fossil fuels and land-use change. The future rate of rise will depend on uncertain economic, sociological, technological, and natural developments. Accordingly, the IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios gives a wide range of future CO2 scenarios, ranging from 541 to 970 ppm by the year 2100.[27] Fossil fuel reserves are sufficient to reach these levels and continue emissions past 2100 if coal, tar sands or methane clathrates are extensively exploited.[28]
The destruction of stratospheric ozone by chlorofluorocarbons is sometimes mentioned in relation to global warming. mp3 indir usdown.net watchfootballlive.org watchnflfootballlive.net watchfootballlive.org nflfootballonline.org nflfootballonline.net nflfootballlive.net Although there are a few areas of linkage, the relationship between the two is not strong. Reduction of stratospheric ozone has a cooling influence, but substantial ozone depletion did not occur until the late 1970s.[29] Tropospheric ozone contributes to surface warming