In this morning’s roundup of Oscar news ‘n’ notes from around the web, Kathryn Bigelow takes the lead and Carey Mulligan has great toes.
Sasha Stone considers the race in light of Kathryn Bigelow’s DGA win: “In a year with ten Best Picture nominees and a desire to up the ratings, it seems even more shocking that this tiny film, this brilliant, unforgettable masterpiece is making its way through a very difficult awards season and coming out the winner.” She doesn’t jump the gun in predicting an Oscar victory, though; hers is a more thoughful thoughtful analysis that calls “The Hurt Locker” a “bonafide frontrunner” but gives “Avatar” a lot of credit and foresees a tight race. (Awards Daily)
Entertainment Weekly reports on the DGA Awards, with a few words from Bigelow’s acceptance speech and a lot of emphasis on Brad and Angelina. Perfectly understandable, I guess. (EW.com)
Melena Ryzik also recaps the DGA Awards. Afterwards, she says, she ran into porn star Ron Jeremy in the parking garage, where he was talking to “Slumdog Millionaire” director Danny Boyle (left, with Bigelow; photo by Getty Images). Jeremy said it was his seventh year at the show, and that he’s good at picking Oscar winners. Then he said that “Avatar” was going to win Best Picture and Quentin Tarantino Best Director…which I suspect means that he’s not as good at Oscar picks as he thinks. (The Carpetbagger)
Sony Pictures Classics announces that it has acquired rights to “Winter in Wartime,” the Dutch entry in the Oscar foreign-language race. With the acquisition of the World War II drama, Sony now has four of the nine films on the foreign-language shortlist – and all four are among the likeliest to make the final group of five nominees. (The others are “The White Ribbon,” “Un Prophete” and “El Secreto de Sus Ojos.”) (indieWIRE)
David Poland looks at matters with seven weeks to Oscar, and decides he “couldn’t be happier” with the move to 10 nominations. He also says (rightly, I think) that beyond the top several slots, we pundits really have no idea what’s going to be nominated. Then he does what I did a couple of weeks ago: he takes the Top 10 lists he’s compiled on his site, treats them like Oscar ballots and tabulates them using the preferential system. I think his process is a little off (when he recalculates the “magic number,” he doesn’t seem to take into account the obscure but important surplus rule), but he comes up with pretty much the same result I did: “The Hurt Locker” and “Up in the Air” come out on top, followed by “A Serious Man,” “Inglourious Basterds,” “Up” and “Fantastic Mr. Fox.” (Movie City News)
This is what you call stacking the deck. In the L.A. Times, Stephen Farber writes a story headlined “Some Oscar Hopefuls Aren’t Up to the Gold Standards of Their Past,” in which he compares 2009 films to similar ones from the past in order to prove that “the quality of movies has not kept pace with the soaring grosses, to put it mildly.”
