Sign up for First Take, our daily insider email
Complete Awards Season Coverage

Franchises Rule the Roost at Paramount These Days

Franchises Rule the Roost at Paramount These Days

EMAIL
PRINT

Lessons learned this summer on the Paramount lot? Make lots of franchises.

After the big numbers posted this summer by “Star Trek”  ($257 m) and “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” ($401 m) and even “G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra” ($294 m), the studio is hunkered down making fewer movies for less money that are franchises and thus likely to keep spinning off money, according to executives who run the place.

There are plans afoot to make a sequel to “Star Trek” with J.J. Abrams, naturally. 

Also in the cooking phase is yet another “Mission: Impossible” with Tom Cruise, with Abrams – who directed the third in the series – attached as producer.

But the kicker that makes the studio Franchise Central is a vote to make a sequel to “G.I. Joe,” which endured all manner of pre-release rumors that it was troubled, and reportedly cost something close to $200 million to make. It got slammed by the critics.

But it made a boatload of dough.

“We weren’t happy with the movie,” said a senior Paramount executive, who spoke on condition of not being identified.  (A whopping 37% on Rotten Tomatoes.)

But plans are moving forward.

And while Paramount is moving on the sequel, the powers that be also are demanding that it cost less a lot less than the original, something that is usually nigh impossible to accomplish with a successful blockbuster. 

Also, they want the movie to be good this time. 

Dennis Quaid, who played General Hawk, has already said he’s interested in playing the commanding officer again. No surprise there.  The lead actors are tied up for another installment, including Marlon Wayans, Sienna Miller and Rachel Nichols.

No word on Stephen Sommers, who may well be associated with some of the highest-grossing schlock this decade.

It's the way to get through a recession.

“We’re having a good year as these things go,” said the executive. “But it’s a rough, rough time. Every day is a struggle.”

Comments

tiffanys is a famous Tiffany Jewelry Shop which sell directly Tiffany Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Pendants, Bracelets, Bangles, Accessories.

Large numbers of splendid tiffany jewelries which are of hottest designs and discount price allow you to be as shining as Oscar stars with the possible ...

I guess, you are missing a point here....Van Helsing which was made with the same budget as GI Joe ($175 million) was considered as a flop even though it made $300 million. GI Joe is probably going to settle down at $300 million. It stands at $296 million now. Ironically Van Helsing was a Stephen Sommers movie as well.

Usually half of the boxoffice collections go to the distributor. So the makers of GI Joe will be left with around $150 million in their hands falling short of the production budget by a huge margin. Add the marketing budget to that (may be $70-80 million) and the end result is huge financial losses. They may be able to recover some of it from the satellite rights, merchandizing and DVD/Blu Ray sales.

And it can't be compared withe success of Star Trek or Transformers since the figures that are given in the write-up are the domestic figures of Trek and TF2. GI Joe's total collections are no where near the total collections of those two movies.

Comments

tiffanys is a famous Tiffany Jewelry Shop which sell directly Tiffany Rings, Earrings, Necklaces, Pendants, Bracelets, Bangles, Accessories.

Large numbers of splendid tiffany jewelries which are of hottest designs and discount price allow you to be as shining as Oscar stars with the possible ...

I guess, you are missing a point here....Van Helsing which was made with the same budget as GI Joe ($175 million) was considered as a flop even though it made $300 million. GI Joe is probably going to settle down at $300 million. It stands at $296 million now. Ironically Van Helsing was a Stephen Sommers movie as well.

Usually half of the boxoffice collections go to the distributor. So the makers of GI Joe will be left with around $150 million in their hands falling short of the production budget by a huge margin. Add the marketing budget to that (may be $70-80 million) and the end result is huge financial losses. They may be able to recover some of it from the satellite rights, merchandizing and DVD/Blu Ray sales.

And it can't be compared withe success of Star Trek or Transformers since the figures that are given in the write-up are the domestic figures of Trek and TF2. GI Joe's total collections are no where near the total collections of those two movies.