Why 'Wild Things' = 'Wild Bunch' (Commentary)

Why 'Wild Things' = 'Wild Bunch' (Commentary)

Published: October 15, 2009 @ 9:03 am
Print this page
By Desson Thomson

It just so happens that I saw “Where the Wild Things Are” a few weeks before my students -- I am teaching them a college course in American movies this semester -- are due to watch Sam Peckinpah’s “The Wild Bunch.”

My brain registered the obvious: that both movies have “Wild” in the title. But being the overactive organ that it -- thankfully -- still is, the same brain started to make other connections.

Which is why “health care” and “town hall meetings” also entered the anything-goes domain of this unedited thinking process.  

“Wild Things,” which Spike (“Being John Malkovich”) Jonze directed, is the adaptation of Maurice Sendak’s inspired and brief 1963 bedtimer about a young boy whose primal urges make him a sort of persona non grata in the eyes of his mother. He is screaming, howling and carrying on, the way boys do. The way animals do. And in doing so, he is connecting -- without any self consciousness -- to the wild side of his nature.

He still has a viable link with the primeval. So his mother, that benevolent martinet of civilization, that id basher, sends him to bed without supper.

So the boy retreats deep into his imagination and goes to find a world that does not fear the wild side -- that fully embraces it. And he sets sail for a land where Wild Things live.

He meets all manner of furry monsters and he becomes their leader. He celebrates their monster lifestyle with a royally declarative “Let the wild rumpus start!” and he enjoys a sort of primeval lost weekend. After an untold amount of time, he returns home, emotionally readjusted, in time for his still-hot dinner.

Mom is there, all hugs, smiles and reconciliation.

Sendak’s story was deceptively simple and brief, but it played such deep human chords, parents and children have been resonating, bedside, ever since.

It seems to me that “The Wild Bunch,” Peckinpah’s 1969 movie, is simply the adult version of the same thing. It’s a lament for man’s uncivilized side, and yet it’s also an implied admonishment for man’s tendency towards violence. In the movie, a gang of professional thieves find themselves caught in the precipitous gap between two social stages in the American story -- the era of lawless independence and the coming of the motor car, the train and the technology of a commercially and socially and morally interdependent society.

The men in “The Wild Bunch” are essentially grown-up, chin-stubbled, snaggle-toothed, hard-drinking, gun-toting versions of Max. They are always looking for a wild rumpus. But in this emerging world, wild rumpuses are becoming illegal. If they continue to rob banks and kill anyone who gets in their way, they are going to be sent to a different kind of bed -- the wooden kind that’s buried underground.       

Both movies lament the sanctity of the id, yet acknowledge it needs serious monitoring. Man is inherently aggressive and even needs to be. But there are consequences, without those government (read Mom) controls.

Tags: Maurice Sendak, Movies, reviews, Spike Jonze, Where the Wild Things Are
Ear on the Oscars

Get Our Daily Email, and Receive Invitations to Our Screenings Series

Start your day with all of the news worth knowing

What's First Take?

Ear on the Oscars
Transformer Sound

Description

Desson Thomson was a film critic for the Washington Post for 21 years. Since leaving the Post in May 2008, he has become a freelance writer, a pop-cultural commentator on NPR's "Weekend Edition," a public speaker, speech writer and a blogger on his website, DessonThomson.com.

Subscribe to Desson Thomson
Most Popular
Wrap Tweets