How Paramount Kept ‘Noah’ From Sinking and Beat the Bad Buzz – Again

How Paramount Kept 'Noah' From Sinking and Beat the Bad Buzz – Again

This is the third time the studio turned criticism of a high profile movie into awareness – and box office. But who's counting?

“Noah” withstood a tsunami of bad buzz to score a $44 million debut last weekend and capture the top spot at the box office.

The opening won't be one for the record books, and with a reported production budget of $125 million, the picture must navigate more rough weather on its journey to profitability, but it's the latest example of Paramount Pictures taking a pricey high-profile movie that could have capsized under the weight of punishing headlines and launching it successfully.

In the case of “Noah,” Paramount remained sensitive to the concerns of religious leaders, while selling the film with the kind of lavish special effects that appealed to secular crowds.

Also read: ‘Noah’ Rides Controversy to $44 Million Box-Office Triumph (Video)

Paramount pulled off a similar feat with Brad Pitt‘s “World War Z” last summer, and again with Martin Scorsese and Leonardo DiCaprio‘s “The Wolf of Wall Street” last Christmas, both of which were plagued with stories about last-minute reshoots and marathon edits.

Those films not only averted disaster but went on to box office success. The $190 million “World War Z” was pilloried for budget overruns and for jettisoning its original ending, but opened to a better-than-expected $66 million in June and went on to make $540 million worldwide. It will spawn a sequel.

Also read: ‘Noah’ Reviews: Is Darren Aronofsky's Biblical Vision Divine or Dumb?

The $100 million “The Wolf of Wall Street,” which was produced by Red Granite and distributed by Paramount, drew fire for its explicit scenes of drug use and sexual debauchery. But instead of shying away from the controversy, Paramount embraced it as a tool to drive awareness. That film's box office is now up to $390 million worldwide, no small feat for an R-rated movie centered on a financial fraudster.

Also read‘Shame on You!’ Says Academy Member to Martin Scorsese at ‘Wolf of Wall Street’ Screening

Megan Colligan, Paramount's president of domestic marketing and distribution, told TheWrap that “Noah” was uncharted territory. ”Darren delivered a movie that was complicated, a little bit arthouse, an action movie and spiritual all at the same time,” she said. ”We couldn't sell it like '300' and we couldn't sell it like ‘Son of God,’ because it wasn't either of those – it was both.”

She added: “The key was to provide moviegoers with context, so that they would know what they were going to see.”

Going into last weekend, the story of “Noah” – the movie – was of a studio at war with director Darren Aronofsky,  best known for “Black Swan,” and under siege from Christian groups over deviations from the Bible, while a wildly expensive production hung in the balance.

“Had Darren made some choices that would have made the movie more orthodox, I think it would have gotten more support from the Christian community, but it's still a terrific opening,” Phil Cooke, a media consultant who spoke with Paramount during its outreach to Christian leaders, said.

Also read: Darren Aronofsky Knew Nothing About Paramount's Last-Minute ‘Noah’ Changes (Exclusive)

Fidelity aside, Aronofsky's take on the Old Testament tale debuted domestically with roughly $10 million more than what analysts had projected it would amass. It will cross the $100 million mark worldwide in two weeks.

From “World War Z” to “Noah,” the negativity came out before the film did. But there's more to it than that. A willingness on the part of the production team to be open to change helps. Brad Grey, chairman and chief executive at Paramount Pictures, green-lighted “Noah” and was willing to do whatever it took to put the best film out there. 

Pitt's zombie thriller “World War Z” went through several endings, at no small cost, before it found the right one. And “Noah” was extensively test-screened and tweaked before Aronofsky and Paramount settled on the final cut.

Aronofsky spent weeks creating exploratory versions of the film, with a particular line of dialogue or an extended scene, and getting feedback from test audiences.

Also read: Biblical Scholar on ‘Noah’ Script: ‘Anti-Human, Pro-Environmental Polemic’ (Guest Blog)

Paramount also dealt with some of the criticism of “Noah” head-on and began its outreach to religious leaders early in the process. They were invited to the set and had dinner with the studio's top executives while the picture was still shooting.

“They did a very good job of getting religious leaders connected so they could start talking about it early on,” Cooke said. “However, they might have emphasized the perspective that Darren was taking on the story of Noah more. He comes from a secular Jewish background and he's an atheist, so it makes sense that he was going to go to ancient Jewish sources that Christians don't know much about.”

Adding a disclaimer was a key part of Paramount's campaign to the church-going crowd. Even if the message Paramount added to the film – that it was a creative adaptation of the Old Testament tale and not a literal one – didn't change many minds among the faith-based crowds, the media reports on it sent a message to the mainstream that this was more than a religious movie.

Also read: Paramount Adds Explanatory Note to ‘Noah’ After Pressure by Religious Group

“We wanted people to know that they weren't just going to Sunday school,” said Colligan, “But we discovered in our research that even if people didn't identify themselves as religious, they wanted a movie about Noah to be entertaining first of all, but it was also important to them that it be true to the themes of Scripture, and it was.”

Chris Aronson, head of distribution at rival studio Fox, tipped his hat.

“They positioned it both as faith-based film and an event movie and connected on both,” he said. Fox will be looking to do the same in December with Ridley Scott's “Exodus: Gods and Kings,” which stars Aaron Paul and Christian Bale. Even fan boys got the message and flocked to Imax theaters, which delivered 14 percent of the grosses.

“Noah” is as much an effects-laden disaster film as it is Biblical saga, but it has a brain and the critics have noticed. It's at 76 percent positive on Rotten Tomatoes, the same range that “World War Z” and “The Wolf of Wall Street” are in. Once those hit theaters, much of the criticism of the first two films faded, or at least became more informed and measured.

“Paramount did a good job of making it look like an epic action adventure,” Paul Dergarabedian, senior analyst at Rentrak, told TheWrap. “Secular crowds love Russell Crowe with a ‘Gladiator’ beard, and the studio knew that in order to entertain an audience, they needed to take poetic license. They found a balance between being faithful and staying entertaining.”

 

  • james wolk

    Well, yes, if every studio released only a handful of movies a year, a marketing/pr department could focus on each film intensely. Paramount did an OK job, but would love to see how they perform when they have to release a dozen or more films each year.

  • nelson

    Dear writers,
    I just read your confusing article about how paramount pictures avoided a complete disaster of the movie Noah !!! From my vantage point this article avoids what I wrote
    in the Hollywood reporter, that this movie will be remembered as an attempt by the director to completely avoid any biblical references that historically have been accepted, not only by the faith based community. But by a global audience, who are, quite familiar with the basics of Noah's life and God's judgment on the world at the time !! But the producers went out of their way to reinforce a liberal interpretation, or like they would like to say, a more contemporary view. They forgot that the bible is not like the Harry Potter books, that to many “artistic liberties” to this universal story will not resonate here in our land, and especially to a global audience, which by the way, are more familiar with the book of Genesis, and the bible than Americans !!! Russell
    Crowe, the expensive CGI, and the beautiful Jennifer Connelly can't save this movie !!
    Glad to say, it Failed !!!

    • Harvey

      Dear Nelson,
      Anyone actually working on making motion pictures – Noah or any other – will dismiss the opinion of anyone who says “Glad to say, it failed”.

      • Brainache

        Dear Harvey
        I stopped taking him seriously as soon as he said “biblical references that have historically been accepted not only by the faith based community but by a global audiences”.

  • Haaseline

    If read from a Marketing Mind vs Ideology this was a very good article.. presented the facts without the social views…a rarity for The Wrap..but congrats on a good article !!

  • bill stamets

    Mystified by hyperbole like “tsunami of bad buzz” and “under siege from Christian groups.” Tracked earliest online reactions to script draft and studio screenings of clips, and found awfully little informed outrage by opinion-leaders with any leverage on moviegoers in demographics of concern. What is the metric for “controversy” in this kind of coverage? Versus THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CHRIST and THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST. For NOAH there was more like a ripple of misgivings from skeptics, and no “Christian group” made anything amounting to a wave in the weeks leading up to NOAH's release. Or do you mean to say Paramount Pictures is simply playing entertainment industry editors (at TheWrap and elsewhere) to take this line in order to seed those “punishing headlines” for the sake of marketing?