Sex, Lies and Invective: Inside the Whole ‘Blue Is the Warmest Color’ Mess

Sex, Lies and Invective: Inside the Whole 'Blue Is the Warmest Color' Mess

From the NC-17 rating to the war of words between the director and his stars, a Palme d'Or-winning art movie has become a hotbed of controversy

Five months after leaving the Cannes jury enraptured and taking home the Palme d’Or, Abdellatif Kechiche’s “Blue Is the Warmest Color” has become such a hot mess that you have to wonder if an English-language remake (or a making-of TV movie) is in the works starring Lindsay Lohan and Miley Cyrus.

The film’s explicit lesbian sex scenes raised eyebrows around the world. The French distributors publicly thumbed their noses at the Academy. The actresses said the director was a monster. The director threatened to sue one of his leading ladies.

Is this any way to promote a movie?

And it’s not as if “Blue Is the Warmest Color” needed the extra controversy, because it would have been one of the year’s most talked-about movies even if nobody involved in the film had ever opened his or her mouth. After all, the film is a quietly wrenching three-hour coming-of-age story about the romantic and sexual awakening of a teenage girl, and a film that lingers on the details of everyday life, from brushing one’s teeth to having sex.

Also read: ‘Blue Is the Warmest Color’ Review: Porn? No. Sexy and Moving? Absolutely

Over the past two months, a series of spats, flare-ups and contretemps have kept what essentially is a beautiful art movie in a spotlight that makes it look far cheaper, sillier and messier offscreen than it is onscreen.

So here’s a guide to the many controversies that have beset a richly deserving Palme d’Or winner that left the Croisette seemingly hell-bent on self-destruction.

Controversy  No. 1: It’s got a 20-minute lesbian sex scene!
That, at least, was the word out of the initial screenings at Cannes, when many reviewers spent so much time talking about the length of the film’s first sexual encounter that they hardly had room to point out that the movie was a moving story of first love featuring a revelatory performance from newcomer Adele Exarchopoulos.

The film has a number of intimate scenes – and yes, like most other scenes in the movie, they are lengthy. Still, the scene in question (which is actually the film’s second sex scene, after a dream sequence) is probably less than 10 minutes of screen time – but at a time when movie sex generally amounts to a few seconds of heavily-edited writhing and carefully-negotiated exposure, it seems as if Kechiche is spending 20 minutes between (or mostly on top of) the sheets.

“Carnal passion is integral to the story, but it was a surprise for me to see the big reaction to it,” Kechiche told TheWrap in an interview. “It was not about sex just as sex. I was trying to provoke a moment of beauty and passion, something that would communicate emotion.”

blue-warmest-colornews.jpgSee video: ‘Blue Is the Warmest Color’ Trailer Celebrates Love — and All the Awards It Has Received

Controversy No. 2: It’s about female sexuality, but it’s a male fantasy!
In the aftermath of the first wave of rave reviews, a handful of critics – many of them women – stepped in to offer a dissenting view: that Kechiche’s film was a male fantasy of female sexuality, an example of “the male gaze” run amok.

Writing about a post-coitus shot of Exarchopoulos, the New York Times’ Manohla Dargis wrote,“as the camera hovers over her open mouth and splayed body even while she sleeps with her derriere prettily framed, the movie feels far more about Mr. Kechiche’s desires than anything else … However sympathetic are the characters … Mr. Kechiche registers as oblivious to real women.”

“To say that one depiction of two women in a sexual setting is representative of anything is wrong,” Kechiche told TheWrap. “This is not a man trying to visualize something, it’s an artist working with other artists, with two actresses I trusted to create this sexual magnetism. The notion that it’s a male gaze upon a female situation is to limit it.”

blue_is_the_warmest_color_5Controversy No. 3: It’s not eligible for the foreign-language Oscar, and it doesn’t care!
Winning the Palme would seemingly have put “Blue” on the fast track to becoming France’s official submission in the Oscar race for Best Foreign Language Film – except that the film wasn’t scheduled for release in its home country until Oct. 9, less than two weeks after the Sept. 30 release deadline required to qualify for the Oscars.

The film’s French distributor, Wild Bunch, flatly refused to move the date to accommodate Oscar, calling the AMPAS rules “stupid,” the category unimportant and the Palme much more important than the Oscar.

The last of those may be true at the French box office, but it’s not elsewhere: If you look at the last 10 foreign-language films to win the Palme d’Or, the four that were also nominated for Oscars all grossed more than $2 million in the United States. The six that weren’t nominated all grossed less than that.

Also read: Oscar's 2013 Foreign-Language Entries: The Complete List

And then there’s the dirty little secret that “Blue” might have been a tough sell for Academy foreign-language voters, who tend to be conservative. Many longtime AMPAS-watchers suspect that the film would not have played particularly well to the general committee that picks six of the nine shortlisted films in the category, and would have needed to be “saved” by the executive committee that makes the final three selections.

Controversy No. 4: NC-17!
This barely qualifies as a real controversy. When Sundance Selects picked up the film out of Cannes, the company didn’t really have much choice in the matter. Cutting down the film for the MPAA would have required completely gutting it to have any shot at an R rating; a company that prides itself on handling challenging films simply couldn’t do that.

Its real options, then, were to release the film unrated – Sundance Selects is not an MPAA signatory, so it doesn’t have to go through the ratings board – or to submit it and accept the NC-17. The latter course shows more faith in the film, and says that the NC-17 rating ought to be legitimate, and not a badge of shame.  (Fox Searchlight’ tried that two years ago with Steve McQueen’s aptly-titled “Shame,” and won rave reviews but not much business.)

One theater, the IFC Center in New York’s Greenwich Village, has even announced that it will admit high-schoolers, ignoring the non-binding MPAA recommendation that theaters not admit anyone under 17.

Also read: MPAA Can't Enforce Rating as NY Theater Ignores NC-17 for ‘Blue Is the Warmest Color’

In France, the film has a rating that allows it to be seen by anyone over 12 – though Kechiche told TheWrap that even he finds that rating a bit liberal. “I have children, and I wouldn't want my [nine-year-old] daughter to see it before she was 13,” he said.

Told of Kechiche’s comment in a separate interview with theWrap, “Blue” co-star Lea Seydoux laughed. “Thirteen?” she said. “His daughter is going to have problems when she grows up.”

Controversy No. 5: The director was abusive!
That Seydoux comment leads into the more damaging controversies, which began around the time of the film’s Telluride and Toronto screenings.  At the former festival, in a Daily Beast interview, Seydoux and Exarchopoulos spent part of the conversation painting Kechiche as a demanding taskmaster who required 100 takes of a simple scene, asked for shocking intimacy while spending 10 days shooting the sex, pushed them to hurt themselves in a fight scene and screamed when things didn’t go the way he wanted.

The director “is a genius, but he’s tortured,” Exarchopoulos said in the interview. “We wanted to give everything we have, but sometimes there was a kind of manipulation, which was hard to handle.”

When asked if they’d work with him again, Seydoux replied, “never,” and Exarchopoulos said, “I don’t think so.”

Also read: ‘Blue Is the Warmest Color’ Stars in Tear-Filled Spat With Director Over Difficult Shoot

The interview – much of which also praised Kechiche and the film – raised a stink when it ran early in the Toronto festival. But in an interview with TheWrap a few days later in Toronto, both actresses backed off their harshest comments.

“It was not so comfortable,” Seydoux said. “But it was not abuse. That was blown out of proportion.”

At the same time, Kechiche talked about the difficulties but didn’t badmouth either of his stars. “They were two very different actresses in the way they approached the roles,” he said. “Adele was very open and offered a lot. She would try things, and she would often throw herself into giving different choices. With Lea, I had a more careful, intellectual approach – she was always asking questions about why the character did this. The big challenge of it was to get both actresses to access the right place at the same time.

“But that’s not a negative – it was exciting.”

Controversy No. 6: It shouldn’t be released!
Kechiche showed himself to be prickly, thin-skinned and emotional in the aftermath of the actresses’ Telluride comments, telling Telerama, ”I think this film should not go out. It was too sullied … In advance, they [viewers] will ask, ‘Did this man not harass the girls?’”

But this one blew over quickly, because at the New York Film Festival two weeks later, Kechiche told Indiewire that of course he wanted the movie released. “It was a remark that was just blurted out at the moment, but it’s not what I really think,” he said.

Controversy No. 7: Lea Seydoux is an ungrateful prima-donna!
As for what Kechiche really thinks – well, the director may have spilled the beans on that front this week, when he went on what In Contention’s Guy Lodge called “an epic rant” in a corrosive and inflammatory 6,200-word open letter on the French website Rue89.

Also read: ‘Blue Is the Warmest Color’ Director Slams Star, Threatens Legal Action

In his screed, which also took shots at French critics of his movie, Kechiche called Seydoux an “arrogant, spoiled child” who is “full of opportunism,” and said that her comments “risked the destruction of this already-fragile film a few weeks from its release.”

Added Kechiche, “I see nothing more there than flagrant nonsense … and beyond that, perverse fakery and the worst kind of manipulation in a context where she knew that such lies would have a disastrous effect.”

He also threw in a vague legal threat, as if he might sue if the grosses aren’t high enough: “She has obligations that she must fulfill, and I will return to it. It is for her to explain in court, because she is an adult and responsible for her actions.”

It is unlikely Kechiche can take this one back as quickly as his comment that the movie shouldn't be released – and it’s possible that a polemic so heated could be the final thing that turns a sensitive and beautifully-rendered love story into a sideshow. On the other hand, Lars von Trier made an enormous fuss with his Cannes comments when promoting “Melancholia,” and that film still ended up on a lot of Top 10 lists at the end of the year.

Is it too late to suggest that everybody just shut up and let the movie do the talking?

  • http://teadoust.blogspot.com/ teadoust II

    it's weird. the more i read about this movie, the less interested i am in seeing it.

    • http://outinthestreetfilms.com/ Out in the Street Films

      Which is why you took the time to tell us about it

      • http://teadoust.blogspot.com/ teadoust II

        my post wasn't a joke or anything. i figured that there might be a few people like me out there: people who were interested in seeing this film when they originally heard about it, but who have kinda lost interest as it's turned into a weird sideshow.

        here's a tip: other people on the internet may not share your exact opinions on many subjects. the trick is not to get all butthurt over shit that isn't important. are you a stockholder in the company releasing blue is the warmest color? the screenwriter of the film? the director? if you have no actual connection to the film, what other people think of it really should be of no concern to you.

        • http://outinthestreetfilms.com/ Out in the Street Films

          You must be looking in the mirror

  • Vic Clay

    Saw it last night… Don't enjoy the directors style of s so many head shots. Seems over long and interesting that no reviews mention that end credits say it was volume 1 and volume 2. Still very worth experiencing. Felt very real like peeking through a window on a life not a film.

    • http://outinthestreetfilms.com/ Out in the Street Films

      peeking through a window on a life sounds like a film

  • taratree

    Some directors (and their crew I might add) are nothing but voyeurs. 10 days for a sex scene? “100 takes for a simple scene” ? Who wants to support this director's voyeurism of young women? I hope no one. Also, female actresses could have better judgment when it comes to accepting any role, especially where explicit sex scenes are so called “required” –they should do themselves (and viewers) a favor, and simply just say no. An imaginative director can portray romance and sex without being explicit. Also, the actresses and the director need to ask themselves what kind of legacy they leaving their family, their children, and the world at large, with their “work”? They need to ask themselves how does this film make the world a better place to live in? Sounds to me like this film is a good one to pan (ignore)–and anyone who screens it ….well, I would question their morals and motives too. It's also very sad too that many “legitimate” movies are going the way of porn–all over the world.

    • http://outinthestreetfilms.com/ Out in the Street Films

      How many takes do you do your sex scenes in?

  • Vinci_Smetana

    If Kechiche wants to settle the controversy, may I suggest he make the gay male equivalent of Blue? That may pacify the naysayers.

    • rebelmountainman

      Oh please NO, we've had enough with the poop packers

      • Vinci_Smetana

        With your third-grade-level vocabulary and ignorant sensibilities, we've had enough of you too.

        • rebelmountainman

          LOL just telling the truth

          • Vinci_Smetana

            The truth that was passed down to you by collective ignorance. Nothing to laugh about.

          • rebelmountainman

            LOL

          • Vinci_Smetana

            Typical hetero-normative response from someone too damaged/conditioned to the realities of sexual minorities today. To be expected.

          • rebelmountainman

            LOL Your the one that's damaged in the head.

          • Vinci_Smetana

            And you're the one who responded, which just further illustrates my point.

            By the way,
            “Your” is possessive.
            “You're” is a contraction.

            Your Deliverance-style education skipped that day in school to go shooting. #ProudHonky

  • http://outinthestreetfilms.com/ Out in the Street Films

    I bet a million of the profits from my next movie that this film easily makes over $2M in the US.

    • http://teadoust.blogspot.com/ teadoust II

      definitely. lots of creepy straight dudes will go see this repeatedly.

  • Film_Shark

    Anybody know where I can catch ‘Blue’ on VOD?