TheGrill: FX's John Landgraf on a la Carte Cable's Threat to Hollywood's Creativity, ‘Breaking Bad’ Regrets

“I think it's a risk to the whole ecosystem,” FX Networks CEO tells TheWrap

During a far-ranging discussion at TheGrill, FX Networks CEO John Landgraf discussed the push for a la carte cable programming, saying it would be a big threat to the Hollywood's creative community, cable industry — and ultimately a disservice to the consumers — if it took place.

“I think it's a risk to the whole ecosystem,” Landgraf said at TheGrill, TheWrap's fourth annual Media Leadership Conference, in Beverly Hills, adding that it was a threat to the creative process.

He estimated that half the jobs would disappear if the current model went away. “If that happened, you'd see the greatest recession in the history of Hollywood.”

While he acknowledged “a certain amount of genuine consumer irritation” over the current cable model and its resultant prices, he insisted that it's still a relatively cheap form of entertainment compared to other forms of entertainment and that the current way of doing business is essential to a financially viable entertainment industry.

Also read: Why A La Carte Cable Could Kill TV's Golden Age

“There are a lot of interested parties that would like to see the system fall apart,” Landgraf said, but “it's just a really efficient economic model.” Particularly for Hollywood.

“If you look at the town we sit in and all of the agencies and all of the people in these agencies … they're dependent on this model. They're absolutely dependent on this model,” Landgraf said.

Much of the revenue from pay-TV subscriptions is used to fund programming, he said. And ultimately, for the consumer, unbundling would lead to “more homes paying higher prices for fewer channels.”

He noted that that the current process allows for more networks to reach a minimum of 70 million homes, a level of exposure that he said national advertisers require. No one, he said, would buy advertising on a network in only 30 million homes — “there would be no benefit to it for a Proctor & Gamble.”

Also read: TheGrill: Online Giant Break Media's Next Move – Tentpole Projects for TV

Jonathan Alcorn

Jonathan Alcorn

As for Arizona Sen. John McCain's bill to unbundle cable channels, Landgraf said it was “total political grandstanding.” McCain, he said, “has no significant support” in either Congress or the Senate.

Landgraf also discussed FX's decision earlier this year to split into three networks — the original FX, the comedy-centric FXX and the movie channel FXM.

Even in this age of Netflix and other viewing options, Landgraf said, there are “a number of underlying economic reasons why we think it still makes sense” to develop three separate linear channels and that splitting the pie three ways would create “a larger economic model” that will allow them to further invest in programming.

As for FXX, Landgraf said that the growth of the network, which launched Sept. 2, has been modest, but encouraging, generating 1.4 million of hours of consumption in its first three days. When you do the math, Landgraf said, “three human lives were consumed in the first three days of this dinky little channel.”

He said that FX itself was built on risk-taking — but admitted to one risk he didn't take.

“I wish I hadn't passed on ‘Breaking Bad,’ I can tell you that. I had ‘The Shield,’ ‘Nip and Tuck’ and ‘Rescue Me.’ I thought, Gost, a white male anti-hero network seems kind of narrow to me.”


  • Bob Loblaw

    “He doesn’t have any significant support.”

    Translation: I bought off enough congressmen so it doesn't matter.

  • eddiestinson

    The guy would be fired if he said anything else. It's a shame The Wrap didn't offer an accompanying article detailing the benefits. SHAME……….

  • SkipB

    Just because Landgraf calls an inefficient marketplace “efficient” doesn't make it so. And his reasoning is flawed too, because consumers will vote with their dollars. Imagine if you were forced to buy 49 crappy stocks to invest in just one good one?! That's what Landgraf wants– to keep the extortion bundling racket going.

  • colcam

    Much of the problem is that the current system is set up to reward the insiders, no matter how bad the product, and keep out anyone who is not of the elite.

    People who don't do a good job might lose those jobs, and that is something the insiders fear.

  • Elle

    The legislation might not make it through but consumers are canceling their cable service. I stream everything now and buy a few shows that I can't stream. This saves me $100 a month, even with the added cost of other services. It's the direction the industry is going and crying about it won't change the facts.

  • Bob

    Three human lives consumed by the likes of FXX programming – what a waste of humanity.

  • HockeyMom

    FX had a few good shows I watched, and a majority of the time it was continuous re-runs of movies. There was no logical reason to evolve into 3 channels except for pure greed. I refuse to add to my high enough cable bill to subscribe. It's a shame…I was a big Sunny in Philadelphia fan…no longer.