Rand Paul's Controversial Column Moves to Breitbart

Rand Paul's Controversial Column Moves to Breitbart

Getty Images

The column was dropped from Washington Times after plagiarism allegation

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul has moved his op-ed column to conservative website Breitbart.com, the site announced on Wednesday.

The column ran in the Washington Times until Tuesday, when the paper announced it had mutually agreed to end it following revelations that portions of at least one op-ed were lifted from an article in The Week without attribution.

Also read: Rand Paul's Op-Ed Column Ends Following Plagiarism Scandal

Times editor John Solomon said at the time: “We expect our columnists to submit original work and to properly attribute material.”

Breitbart CEO Larry Solov also used the word “original” in his quote about Paul's new column, saying: “We are pleased to add Senator Paul to our lineup of fearless, original thought leaders.”

Paul's writing came under fire starting with Rachel Maddow's report that a speech lifted from Wikipedia's entry on “Gattaca.” This was followed up by revelations that portions of his books and his Washington Times column were taken from other sources.

Also read: Rachel Maddow's MSNBC Report Prompts Plagiarism Confession from Rand Paul Aide

On Tuesday, Paul admitted that there were sourcing errors in some of his works, but blamed them on his aides.

No mention of Paul's plagiarism scandal was made in Breitbart's announcement. Instead, the site praised him as a “rising star” and noted that his column would have a bigger audience than it did at the Washington Times.

  • Jim

    What's with the image? A new reality TV series on Lifetime? MTV?

  • Mark O'Neill

    A libertarian or republican columnist has to be extra careful because the dumbocrats have armies of people sitting on unemployment who have nothing better to do than find fault with the product of a working man.

    • Caley McGuire

      And Breitbart apparently has as few journalistic standards as does Paul. A perfect match.

      • Mark O'Neill

        That's Senator Paul to you. Or Doctor Paul.
        What do you do for a living? Do you have deadlines or standards you have to meet? Or does some secretive liberal group pay you to be snarky?

        • Caley McGuire

          With every passing day more information is revealed that further substantiates Paul's lack of journalistic integrity. Yet he doubles-down and is outraged that his lapses are noticed by others. Just a terrific guy.