The goal of advertisers is simple: to reach consumers. So as consumers shift from reading traditional periodicals to Internet content, advertisers generally follow. Over long periods of time, advertisers should allocate their spending in the same way that consumers allocate their time.
Since advertising spend should follow consumer time shifts, we now have a way to forecast the future of advertising spend. Let’s start by investigating whether this method would have predicted advertising spend today.
Also Read: Viewers Still Prefer Traditional TV Content - But Streaming Is Gaining Fast (Guest Blog)
Let’s look back to 2002 in the chart below. If there was perfect balance, you would expect all media to fall near the red parity line (the “balanced ad spend and time share” dotted line on the chart). But the 2002 data indicates a major disconnect between ad share and time share. As you can see, newspapers and magazines commanded a disproportionately large share of the ad dollars, even though cable TV and radio at that time were more significant in terms of audience time.
Between 2002 and today, the prediction methods work: ad spend follows shifts in consumer time.
On average, ad spend corrects. Most notably, the percentage of ad dollars spent on newspapers dropped to approximately one third of what it used to be. Note that time spent reading newspapers continues to drop, and we would expect ad spend to drop further toward the parity line.
As expected, ad spend on radio dropped as consumers turned away from radio. As expected, ad spend on Internet and mobile increased as consumers turned toward Internet and mobile.
Also Read: Why the TV Industry Fears a Spread of Millennials' Viewing Habits (Guest Blog)
While consumer time spent on cable TV stayed roughly the same, advertisers shifted spend to cable TV because it was so far out of balance in 2002. Advertisers were underspending on the medium in 2002, and advertisers corrected their spend toward the balance line by 2015.
In summary, for almost all media, ad spend follows consumer time, and the dots tend to track toward the 50/50 line in the graphic (toward balanced ad spend and time share).
But one medium resisted gravity. In 2002, broadcast TV straddled the 50/50 line; in 2015, it’s not even close.
What does this bucking of the trend mean for the future of broadcast TV? If ad dollars follow time share, we could see a 25 to 50 percent drop in broadcast TV ad revenues. But for now, advertisers are sticking with broadcast TV. As hot as digital advertising seems to be these days, many advertisers find that it doesn’t provide the same reach and return on investment that broadcast TV does.
Also Read: Why Netflix's Model May Offer the Salvation Movie Theaters Need (Guest Blog)
That said, broadcast TV should be on notice. Even a 10 percent decline in ad revenues could total a billion dollars. Our future posts will speak to the actions that the TV industry is taking to avoid any downturns and participate in mobile growth.
This is Part 3 in a series on television trends by Dan Schechter, Gil Moran and Michael Kaufman from L.E.K. Consulting’s Media & Entertainment consulting practice.
Better Than 'The Good Wife': 16 TV Series Finales That Stuck the Landing (Photos)
-
-
HBO
-
Fox
-
AMC
-
NBC
-
Sony Television
-
FX
-
Comedy Central
-
NBC
-
NBC
-
CBS
-
CBS
-
NBC
-
AMC
-
HBO
-
NBC
-
