Emily Ratajkowski Clarifies Who REALLY Holds Her Boobs Against Her

Breathe easy, Hollywood; you’re off the hook when it comes to discriminating against Emily Ratajkowski’s breasts.

Model/actress Ratajkowski took to Twitter on Wednesday to exonerate Tinsel Town, after complaining that she has trouble finding work because of the size of her breasts.

As it turns out, the real culprit in boob bigotry is the fashion world.

Also Read: Emily Ratajkowski Gets Naked, People Get Angry: A Puzzling Timeline (Photos)

Ratajkowski fired up her Twitter account to set the record straight, explaining, “FYI I was talking about the fashion industry not celebrating the female form, NOT Hollywood.”

FYI I was talking about the fashion industry not celebrating the female form, NOT Hollywood

— Emily Ratajkowski (@emrata) July 5, 2017

“Blurred Lines” beauty Ratajkowski raised eyebrows earlier this week in an interview with with Harper’s Bazaar Australia, bemoaning that her breasts — or rather, people’s attitudes toward them — had closed doors for her professionally.

“There’s this thing that happens to me: ‘Oh, she’s too sexy’,” she said. “It’s like an anti-woman thing, that people don’t want to work with me because my boobs are too big. What’s wrong with boobs? They’re a beautiful feminine thing that needs to be celebrated. Like, who cares? They are great big, they are great small. Why should that be an issue?”

Also Read: Emily Ratajkowski Nude Photo Book Has Model Fuming: 'A Violation'

It wasn’t the first time that Ratajkowski, who’s probably best known for her role in the “Blurred Lines” music video and as Ben Affleck’s mistress in “Gone Girl,” has spoken out about the way people view women’s bodies in Hollywood. In 2016, she came to the defense of friend Kim Kardashian, who was attacked online for posting a topless selfie. Ratajkowski posed with Kardashian — also topless — in response.

“We are more than just our bodies, but that doesn’t mean we have to be shamed for them or our sexuality,” she wrote on Twitter. “Even if being sexualized by society’s gaze is demeaning, there must be a space where women can still be sexual when they choose to be.”

She’s also addressed her inability to land serious roles in Hollywood, saying it came down to her looks.

Also Read: Kim Kardashian-Emily Ratajkowski Topless Selfie Falls Flat With Critics (Photo)

“If you’re a sexy actress it’s hard to get serious roles. You get offered the same thing that they’ve seen you in,” Ratajkowski said.

“People are like sheep and they’re like ‘Oh, that’s what she does well,” she added.

Emily Ratajkowski Gets Naked, People Get Angry: A Puzzling Timeline (Photos)

When model/actress Emily Ratajkowski ditches her clothes, things heat up -- including it seems, people's tempers. Read on for a history of Ratajkowski's tendency to spark anger with her nudity.
The Bare Facts: Ratajkowski busted onto the scene big-time in 2013, loaning her breasts to the video for the Robin Thicke tune "Blurred Lines." And unlike the song itself, nobody doubted their authenticity.
So Who's Complaining? A lot of people, actually. Like the song, the video was branded by some as sexist.
The Bare Facts: In a show of naked sisterhood with Kim Kardashian, Ratajkowski posed for a topless selfie with the reality TV queen in March, featuring both women sans blouses and flipping the bird.
So Who's Complaining? Media personality Piers Morgan, who took to Twitter and hissed, “Just a thought @KimKardashian @emrata – but you could always try wearing a little dignity?" The pundit added, "RIP Feminism."
The Bare Facts: In July, Ratajkowski appeared nude in a photo shoot as Lady Godiva for Harper's Bazaar. The spread was acompanied by an interview with Ratajkowski by feminist author Naomi Wolf.
So Who's Complaining? Morgan, again, who tweeted in response to the photos, "Do you want me to buy you some clothes? You look freezing.”
The Bare Facts: Photographer Jonathan Leder prepares to release a book of photos he shot of Ratajkowski in 2012. The book, slated for a Dec. 2016 release, features numerous photos of Ratajkowski in various states of undress.
So Who's Complaining? In a shocking twist that perhaps nobody saw coming, Ratajkowski herself. In a multi-part Twitter vent, Ratajkowski groused that the photos are being used without her permission, and called the book "a violation."
The Bare Facts: Viacom was hit with a lawsuit after a photo of Ratajkowski was published in an article on the website MTV.it titled "Emily Ratajkowski: HOT Pictures.”
So Who's Complaining? New York-based photographer Steve Sands filed the lawsuit against Viacom claiming unauthorized use of the photo. Alleging copyright infringement, the suit seeks unspecified damages and Viacom’s profits from the photo, or, alternatively, “statutory damages up to $150,000 per work infringed.”
The Bare Facts: Ratajkowski showed her love affair with food as we all would in our weaker moments, by wearing some lingerie and writhing around in some saucy spaghetti for Love Magazine.
Instagram @thelovemagazine
So Who's Complaining? Who else? Piers Morgan, and by extension, turn of the 20th Century British suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst, who Morgan said in an angry tweet must be somewhere vomiting. Days later on "Good Morning Britain," Morgan called Ratajkowski a "global bimbo," stunned that she posts photos of herself in the name of feminism. Morgan's co-host Susanna Reid suggested he has a "personal vendetta" against the actress.

1 of 13

When the ”Blurred Lines“ beauty’s clothes drop, tempers tend to rise

When model/actress Emily Ratajkowski ditches her clothes, things heat up -- including it seems, people's tempers. Read on for a history of Ratajkowski's tendency to spark anger with her nudity.

View In Gallery

Emily Ratajkowski Gets Naked, People Get Angry: A Puzzling Timeline (Photos)

7DAYFREETRIAL

7
DAY
FREE
TRIAL