Former Facebook employees who curated the site’s trending news feed claim the company has had a political bias against stories that might appeal to conservatives.
In a report in Gizmodo, the former Facebook workers said colleagues would prevent stories about right-wing issues such as CPAC, Mitt Romney and Rand Paul from appearing in the influential section, despite the fact that such stories would organically trend among site users.
“Depending on who was on shift, things would be blacklisted or trending,” the former employee told Gizmodo. “I’d come on shift and I’d discover that CPAC or Mitt Romney or Glenn Beck or popular conservative topics wouldn’t be trending because either the curator didn’t recognize the news topic or it was like they had a bias against Ted Cruz.”
The former news curators also claim they were instructed to artificially “inject” particular stories into the trending news section and were also told not to include news about Facebook itself.
The section of Facebook that is allegedly being manipulated helps dictate the news that is accessed by the site’s 167 million users in the United States alone.
“It was absolutely bias. We were doing it subjectively. It just depends on who the curator is and what time of day it is,” a different former employee told Gizmodo. “Every once in a while, a Red State or conservative news source would have a story. But we would have to go and find the same story from a more neutral outlet that wasn’t as biased.”
Drudge Report, Breitbart, Washington Examiner, and Newsmax are among the conservative new organizations that allegedly were flagged as suspect by Facebook curators.
“We take allegations of bias very seriously,” Facebook said in a statement. “Facebook is a platform for people and perspectives from across the political spectrum. Trending Topics shows you the popular topics and hashtags that are being talked about on Facebook. There are rigorous guidelines in place for the review team to ensure consistency and neutrality. These guidelines do not permit the suppression of political perspectives. Nor do they permit the prioritization of one viewpoint over another or one news outlet over another. These guidelines do not prohibit any news outlet from appearing in Trending Topics.”
12 Comments About Donald Trump These Pundits Must Regret Now (Photos)
FiveThirtyEight founder Nate Silver famously predicted all 50 states of the 2012 election -- but when it came to forecasting Donald Trump's chances, he was completely wrong.
He's not the only one. Political pundits, newscasters and celebrities have doubted Trump since he announced his candidacy last June. They've called him everything from a "comical figure" to a "blowhard" and compared him at times to Hitler.
They've also badly underestimated the chances of the now de facto GOP nominee.
Here are 12 of the most regrettable remarks made by talking heads about the man for whom all bets should now be off.
Getty Images
Nate Silver
The FiveThirtyEight founder told CNN's Anderson Cooper that Trump has a "maybe about 5 percent" chance of winning the GOP nomination.
Back in October, the Bloomberg columnist said, “Everything we know about how presidential nominations work says Trump isn’t going to be the nominee, or even come close.”
The New York Times columnist probably feels silly that he sent this tweet in September: “The entire commentariat is going to feel a little silly when Marco Rubio wins every Republican primary.”
The political team over at Young Turks isn't fond of Trump, even imposing a ban on coverage early in his campaign. Back on Aug. 10, Uygur observed that Trump was only running for publicity to help build his name and put it on more buildings.
Last summer, the FiveThirtyEight writer said, “Trump has a better chance of cameoing in another ‘Home Alone’ movie with Macaulay Culkin — or playing in the NBA Finals — than winning the Republican nomination."
Back on June 18, the Huffington Post senior politics editor went on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" to say, "No one is doubting his entertainment value or the fact that he can deliver a good line and the fact that he might have an impact on a debate stage. That's not in doubt. But to say that makes him serious is ridiculous."
In October, the Washington Post columnist promised to, literally, eat his words if Trump won the nomination. Milbank is making good on the promise, pledging to "eat an entire column, newsprint and ink."
The political consultant and former Mitt Romney strategist went on CNN last October to compare Trump to a "Division III [football team] with a really trash-talking coach who says he's gonna take on and win the National Championship ... even though he hasn't won a game." He continued: “I don’t think he’s going to be on the ballot by Feb. 1,."
The MSNBC host has mocked Trump for, well, basically everything. On the "Tonight Show Starring Jimmy Fallon" last August, she said, "I can't imagine that he actually wants to be president."
In December, the New York Times columnist wrote that Trump “does not have broad appeal throughout the party; he is unacceptable to the party’s establishment; and there are reasons to believe that his high numbers may be driven by unsustainable factors."
Talking heads from Nate Silver to Rachel Maddow once dismissed the de facto GOP presidential nominee as a sideshow
FiveThirtyEight founder Nate Silver famously predicted all 50 states of the 2012 election -- but when it came to forecasting Donald Trump's chances, he was completely wrong.
He's not the only one. Political pundits, newscasters and celebrities have doubted Trump since he announced his candidacy last June. They've called him everything from a "comical figure" to a "blowhard" and compared him at times to Hitler.
They've also badly underestimated the chances of the now de facto GOP nominee.
Here are 12 of the most regrettable remarks made by talking heads about the man for whom all bets should now be off.