Judge Dismisses Nirvana ‘Nevermind’ Cover Baby Lawsuit Over Child Abuse Claim

Spencer Elden, who as a baby was photographed for the cover of Nirvana’s “Nevermind,” has until Jan. 13 to file a second amended complaint

Nirvana Nevermind Cover Baby

A federal judge for the Central District of California has dismissed a lawsuit alleging that the cover of Nirvana’s 1991 breakthrough album “Nevermind” amounts to child pornography.

However, Judge Fernando M. Olguin said in court documents obtained by TheWrap that the suit is dismissed “with leave to amend” and that the plaintiff, Spencer Elden, has 10 days to try again.

“In accordance with the court’s order we will be filing a Second Amended Complaint very soon,” Elden’s attorney, Robert Lewis, said in a statement Tuesday to TheWrap. “We are confident that we will be allowed to move forward with the case. 

Elden, now 30 years old, was featured on the instantly iconic cover of “Nevermind” when he was a baby. The cover depicts Elden submerged in a swimming pool, with a dollar bill on the end of a fishhook floating above him. In August 2021, he filed his lawsuit alleging that the photograph, taken by photographer Kirk Weddle, was child porn, and that he couldn’t consent to his image being used.

His lawsuit named Weddle, all surviving members of Nirvana and the estate of lead singer Kurt Cobain, Cobain’s widow Courtney Love, the band’s art director Robert Fisher, Heather Parry and producer Guy Oseary as well UMG, Warner Records and David Geffen’s Geffen Records.

On Dec. 22, representatives for the defendants filed a motion to dismiss. The filing said, “Elden has spent three decades profiting from his celebrity as the self-anointed ‘Nirvana Baby,’” and noted that the statute of limitations for any such complaint has long since passed. The filing also strongly disputed the claim that the image is in any way sexually exploitative.

Judge Olguin gave Elden until Dec. 30 to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss. “Plaintiff did not file any opposition to defendants’ Motion. Accordingly, the court will vacate the hearing date and grant defendants’ Motion,” Olguin said in a statement published Monday night.

However, Olguin dismissed the case “with leave to amend,” and has given Elden until Jan. 13 to file a second amended complaint. “Failure to timely file a Second Amended Complaint shall result in this action being dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order,” Olguin said.

If Elden complies with this directive, the defendants will have until Jan. 27 to reply.

Pamela Chelin contributed to this report.