NEXT

“Instead of being granted immunity, platforms should be required to demonstrate that they have systems in place for identifying unlawful content and removing it,” Zuckerberg will say during his opening remarks, per the early release of his testimony on the House website.

That would be a big change to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, the 1996 law that has provided a broad legal shield protecting tech companies from being sued for what its users say on their platforms.

Also Read: Why Clubhouse's Momentum Could Stall Out

Zuckerberg has previously called on Congress to make changes to Section 230, saying he welcomed amendments that would offer tech giants clear guidelines on how to police their platforms. However, Zuckerberg’s proposal could make it tougher on small and upstart tech companies to find their footing since they’d have to spend money putting a plan in place to remove content. Right now, that’s a choice, not a requirement by law.

“Platforms should not be held liable if a particular piece of content evades its detection — that would be impractical for platforms with billions of posts per day — but they should be required to have adequate systems in place to address unlawful content,” Zuckerberg said in his posted testimony.

Section 230 has come under increased scrutiny from both Democrats and Republicans over the last few years. For a more thorough look at the law, as well as how its absence could impact tech companies like Facebook and Twitter, click here. And for a full preview of Thursday’s hearing on misinformation — including a discussion on whether Section 230 could soon be revised — you can check out the latest episode of TheWrap’s Tech Talk podcast.

Zuckerberg is set to virtually testify before Congress on Thursday alongside Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Google CEO Sundar Pichai.