Mueller Finds No Evidence of Trump Collusion With Russia, Justice Department Declines Obstruction Charge

Attorney General releases four-page summary of key findings from special counsel Robert Mueller’s 22-month investigation

Last Updated: March 24, 2019 @ 1:55 PM

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation found no evidence that President Donald Trump or members of his 2016 presidential campaign conspired with Russia to sway the election, according to a four-page summary released Sunday by U.S. Attorney General William Barr.

Mueller’s report reached no conclusion on the investigation into obstruction of justice by the president: “While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

Nonetheless, Barr states that after he and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein reviewed the report — submitted on Friday, after 22 months of investigation — they concluded that the evidence was “not sufficient to establish that the president committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.”

White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders quickly declared vindication: “The findings of the Department of Justice are a total and complete exoneration of the President of the United States.”

The report itself is divided into two parts: Russian interference in the 2016 electionand obstruction of justice. In the matter of Russian interference, Barr writes that “the Special Counsel did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

As to obstruction of justice, Barr writes writes that the Special Counsel did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. “Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both of the sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the special counsel views as ‘difficult issues’ of law and fact whether the presidents actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction,” Barr writes.

Barr added that the department did not even consider “constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.”

The summary to Congress and subsequently to the press comes two days after the special counsel completed his two-year investigation and submitted his findings to the Department of Justice.

Congressional Democrats have widely called for the Mueller report to be released in full to Congress and to the public, following the passage of a resolution calling on the Justice Department to do so by a House vote of 420-0. If the full report isn’t provided to Congress, House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler said on CNN’s “State of the Union” Sunday, “We will try to negotiate. We will try everything else first. But if we have to, yes, we will certainly issue subpoenas to get that information,”

Democrats are also seeking access to underlying material from Mueller’s investigation, and are expected to subpoena Mueller to testify in Congress.

Barr holds discretion over how much of the report would be released to the public, based on national security interests and the Justice Department guideline that calls for the withholding of information on why certain individuals are not being prosecuted. While 34 individuals have been indicted with seven of them either being convicted or entering guilty pleas, Mueller’s memo to the DOJ said that no further indictments will be made.

That lack of additional indictments was interpreted by many as a sign that Donald Trump would be in the clear of suspected conspiracy of collusion with the Russian government.

“If the special counsel found there is no collusion, that is a vindication for the president,” George Washington University Law School Professor Jonathan Turley told CBS News. “It doesn’t mean that he acted appropriately, it doesn’t even mean that the special counsel didn’t find evidence that could be criminal. But it clearly indicated that he doesn’t believe there is a criminal case to be made.”

But while Mueller’s investigation of Trump is done, other investigations are still ongoing. Among them is an investigation into Trump’s inaugural committee by federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. The prosecutors are searching for a wide range of documents related to the committee’s finances in search of potential crimes that include fraud, disclosure violations, money laundering, and illegal contributions from foreign entities.

SDNY prosecutors are also following up on testimony from former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, which include claims of campaign finance violations related to the hush money paid to Stormy Daniels for her silence on a sexual encounter with Trump. Cohen also disclosed emails with another Trump attorney, Robert Costello, that he says suggested the possibility of a presidential pardon. If that is proven to be true, it could mean an obstruction of justice charge against the president.