NY Times Expresses ‘Regret’ for Profile of Neo-Nazi: ‘The Point Was Not to Normalize Anything’

Feature on Ohio white nationalist has drawn widespread criticism

Last Updated: November 26, 2017 @ 5:00 PM

UPDATED: New York Times national editor Marc Lacey responded to criticism Sunday about a feature written by Richard Fausset titled “A Voice of Hate in America’s Heartland,” explaining how the thinking about the profile of an Ohio neo-Nazi.

“Our reporter and his editors agonized over the tone and content of the article,” Lacey wrote. “The point of the story was not to normalize anything but to describe the degree to which hate and extremism have become far more normal in American life than many of us want to think.”

Lacey went on to say the paper’s editors heard “loud and clear” why some readers wanted more push back. “We regret the degree to which the piece offended so many readers,” he continued. “We recognize that people can disagree on how best to tell a disagreeable story. What we think is indisputable, though, is the need to shed more light, not less, on the most extreme corners of American life and the people who inhabit them. That’s what the story, however imperfectly, tried to do.”

PREVIOUSLY: While The New York Times has earned praise from critics of Donald Trump in the months since he took office, it became the target of contempt on Twitter this weekend after it published a profile on a white supremacist and Nazi sympathizer that many felt normalized hate in America.

Richard Fausset’s feature, “A Voice of Hate in America’s Heartland,” followed Huber Heights, Ohio, resident Tony Hovater who helped start the Traditionalist Workers Party, one of the extreme-right groups that marched in Charlottesville earlier this year.

Critics said that the profile normalized white nationalism by, among other things, describing Hovater as an avid “Seinfeld” watcher whose “Midwestern manners would please anyone’s mother.”

“The problem with this article isn’t that it’s about a Nazi but that it doesn’t add anything to our understanding of modern Nazis,” Vox founder Ezra Klein said in a tweet. “Of course racists shop at supermarkets and play in bands and enjoy Seinfeld and own cats. That evil is also banal is not new.”

Even The Atlantic made fun of the Times for its poor judgment — it’s not just snarky people on Twitter. But others were not as polite with their criticism.

Comedian Patton Oswalt mocked the column with a tweet of his own, while “Jimmy Kimmel Live” writer Bess Kalb, who is Jewish, excoriated the piece for talking about Hovater’s manners.

In a follow-up column, Fausset wrote that he believed his piece was flawed, saying that he failed at his goal of trying to find an explanation for why Hovater had turned to Nazism even after additional interviews. Ultimately, he decided that the absence of such an explanation “would have to serve as both feature and defect.”

But while tech writer Dan Gillmor commended Fausset for his candor, he still believed that if the writer felt this way, the piece should not have been published.

Read more responses to the NYT article below:

Keep
Reading...

Looks like you’re enjoying reading
Keep reading by creating
a free account or logging in.