Producers of Ben Affleck’s ‘Hypnotic’ Sue Insurers for Not Extending Coverage During COVID Shutdown

Action film to be directed by Robert Rodriguez was originally set to film in April

Photo: John Russo

The production companies behind the upcoming Ben Affleck action film “Hypnotic” filed a lawsuit against the film’s insurance company for unspecified damages in response to that company’s refusal to extend coverage any further amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

In a suit filed in the United States District Court for California’s Central District, attorneys representing Hoosgow Productions accused Chubb National Insurance Company of eight causes of action, including breach of contract, tortious breach of the implied covenant of faith and fair dealing, fraud and negligent misrepresentation.

The film, to be directed by Robert Rodriguez, follows Affleck “as a detective who, while investigating a string of high-end heists, becomes ensnared in a mystery involving his missing daughter and a secret government program,” according to the complaint. It was originally set to begin production in April, the complaint says, but due to the pandemic, “Hypnotic,” along with just about every other project in Hollywood, postponed the start of production indefinitely.

Last October, the complaint says, producers secured a $58 million policy on the film running through Oct. 29, 2020. However, CHUBB refused to extend the policy beyond that date, instead offering a renewal plan “with a material reduction in the scope of the insurance,” according to the complaint. Specifically, the new plan would have “an exclusion applicable to losses relating to COVID-19, thereby depriving Hoosegow of coverage that it had purchased and that was promised under the existing policy.”

This contradicts the terms of the original insurance plan, the complaint says, because the producers said the plan had four conditions in order to end: “1. The date on which a protection copy has been completed and stored in an area physically separated from the original production media; 2. 30 days after completion of post-production; 3. The expiration date shown in the Declarations; or 4. The policy is cancelled.”

According to the complaint, there was no actual expiration date as far as covering the production was concerned, and the policy didn’t contain “a virus exclusion, pandemic exclusion, COVID-19 exclusion, or any other similar exclusion.” Though of course, having been written in 2019 it could not have included a COVID-19 reference.

In addition, producers said they initially requested a period of April 2020-April 2021, to coincide with the start of production, the suit says. A Chubb representative, the lawsuit says, suggested a start date of October 2019 to coincide with other Hoosgow projects it was insuring, but that it “can extend as needed.”

Hoosgow is requesting unspecified damages, including repayment of all legal costs, punitive damages, and the extension of the original insurance policy.

A spokesperson for Chubb told TheWrap, “As a matter of policy Chubb does not comment on pending legal matters.”

Pamela Chelin contributed to this report.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.