Immediately following SAG's vote to denounce the closing of the Motion
Picture Home's Long Term Care Center, the MPTF issued a press release from
Frank Mancuso that read, in part:
"It would be a disservice to our community to force into bankruptcy this
indispensable organization simply because family members of the 84 people
living in the facility prefer to have them remain there."
What Mr. Mancuso seems to be forgetting is that we would have more than 84 families except for that trifling detail called “transfer trauma.” It's a bothersome symptom that some feel have claimed more than the expected percentage of those that have died, who were only months ago at home where they belonged.
This is not just about 84 human beings whose lives need to be saved as we speak -- it is unfortunately an Industry class struggle and scheme that is as brilliant for its cunning as the authors are ruthless in their disdain for upholding the promise of “Taking Care of Our Own.”
The MPTF Board leadership that has made this decision and is standing by it mostly comprises former and current "studio leaders" who dominate the masses outside of the soundstages and commissaries. They have found an outlet at the MPTF to continue to exert control over the lives of all Industry workers, this time "to the grave."
This group of vultures conducts its activities and decision-making in secret and is used to answering to no one, save those whose earliest mentors “poured their derision upon everything they did, exposing any weakness however carefully hid.”
Most have wealth of tens of millions of dollars as a safety net for their old age.
Mr. Mancuso states that the Board struggled for years with a way to keep Long Term Care open. If the Board recognized a financial problem with Long Term Care, why didn't it bring it to the attention of the Industry for five years?
The Board never brought this to the attention of the Industry for years because of a hidden agenda whose code word “successful aging” was rubber-stamped on the dossier that detailed the end of the LTC. Instead of taking care of the most vulnerable, the most sick and handicapped, why is it my perception that the Board decided to bring in a team of hatchet men bent on cleansing the MPTF of the LTC?
How is it conceivable that the Long Term Care Facility -- which brings in $10,500 a bed per month, has a charitable tax status, is housed on land and a building owned by the MPTF -- has alleged losses of $12 million per year for approximately 100 people? If you lose money on something like this you should be fired -- not exalted and given raises.
What are the losses at the new swimming pool and fitness center complex that cost millions, for which a membership is $25 per month? Why would the Board undertake construction activities for an extravagant swimming pool, fitness and wellness center during this period when the LTC was languishing?
Why did the Board give huge increases during this period to its top administrators, including a current salary/benefits package in excess of $750,000 to President David Tillman?
Why did it recently announce a construction campaign to renovate and enhance facilities for Independent and Assisted Living?
Why did it present the closure without prior discussion/input outside of its group, as a final verdict with no possibilities of keeping it open?
Why does it refuse to accept donations or undertake a fund raising campaign to keep Long Term Care open to the Industry?
Mr.
