Sen. Al Franken Questions Whether Comcast Can Be Trusted With Time Warner Cable

Sen. Al Franken Questions Whether Comcast Can Be Trusted With Time Warner Cable

“To the extent that Comcast has a history of breaching its legal obligations to consumers, such history should be taken into account”

Sen. Al Franken is wondering: If Comcast failed to keep its promises in the NBCUniversal deal, why should it be trusted with Time Warner Cable?

The Minnesota Democrat is questioning whether Comcast has adequately complied with Net Neutrality, local content and unbundled access to Internet services — promises it made as part of the NBC acquisition — and has raised concerns that the Time Warner deal could raise cable prices.

“I am concerned that the proposed acquisition could result in higher prices, fewer choices, and even worse service for consumers,” Franken wrote in a letter sent Thursday to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler. ”To the extent that Comcast has a history of breaching its legal obligations to consumers, such history should be taken into account when evaluating Comcast's proposal for future market expansion.”

Also read: FCC Will Create New Net Neutrality Rules

Comcast disputes Franken's suggestion that it hasn't made good on its NBCU promises.

“Comcast is proud of our track-record on complying with the conditions from our past transactions including NBCUniversal,” said the statement. “We've gone above and beyond in compliance with most conditions, including our low-income broadband program, the amount of local news programming and investment in local stations, the amount of on-demand programming, especially children's programming, and many more areas.”

Comcast had agreed to adhere to the FCC's Net Neutrality-like “Open Internet Order” even if it was eventually overturned by a court (which it was) to get its NBCU deal through. The Philly-based cable giant also agreed to offer reasonably priced unbundled Internet to consumers who didn't want Comcast's cable or phone services, increase news programming and act in a way that it didn't disadvantage competing channels on its cable systems.

  • Daniel Sterling Sample

    AN OPEN LETTER TO SENATOR AL FRANKEN,
    Sir,
    I can't help but be a little suspicious of your motivation in questioning COMCAST, America's largest cable provider, in its zeal to absorb America's second largest cable provider,TIME WARNER CABLE. Are you really sincere in bringing into question, COMCAST's willingness to keep the INTERNET and CABLE accessible and low cost to America, despite becoming the largest cable and internet provider with the COMCAST/TWC merger? Shouldn't the larger, much more significant question be, why the f*** should America allow this disastrous union in the first place? Your long history in Hollywood should make you abundantly clear that the moguls of Hollywood have one simple goal, the complete control of entertainment and news media in America. So, why should you suddenly raise the question of COMCAST's ability to adhere to the FCC's Net Neutrality-like “Open Internet Order”, an order that has already been overturned by a court? Could it be that you are presenting yourself as an unbiased candidate to sit on the Senate Hearing Committee to oversee the COMCAST/TWC merger? Hmmmm? Daniel Sterling Sample in downtown Hollywood. sample.daniel@gmail.com