Mia Farrow, Scarlett Johansson Continue Woody Allen Molestation Debate

Mia Farrow, Scarlett Johansson Continue Woody Allen Molestation Debate

Getty Images

“I look back at it now and wonder how I could spend my life with someone who did not share what I see as my purest goals,” Farrow said over the weekend

Woody Allen has given his final statement about the resurfaced allegations that he molested his step-daughter, Dylan Farrow, but his allies and ex continue to make headlines over the high profile dispute.

Speaking at an event in Tulsa last Friday, Mia Farrow made several wry jokes about the situation, which she said “shattered” her family, and then opened up about how Allen diminished her.

Also read: Scarlett Johansson Calls Criticism Over Woody Allen Sex Abuse Allegations ‘Irresponsible’

“I often am asked, ‘How could anyone possibly not know what was happening,'” Farrow told the audience at Tulsa's Town Hall. “And the answer is, I think, something that happens to a lot of women. You shrink, as a woman. You allow things to be chiseled away, things that you need to be a strong woman.

Also read: Dylan Farrow Fires Back at Woody Allen Defense: ‘Legalese, Distortions, Outright Lies’

“I look back at it now and wonder how I could spend my life with someone who did not share what I see as my purest goals,” Farrow continued. “My family, my ethics, my faith.”

At the same time, Scarlett Johansson, one of women that took over for Farrow as Allen's on-screen muse, defended the director and their working relationship.

Also read: Woody Allen May Not Be Talking, But His PR Offensive Is Heating Up

“I'm unaware that there's been a backlash,” Johansson, who starred in Allen's “Vicky Cristina Barcelona,” “Match Point,” and  ”Scoop,” told The Guardian. “I think he'll continue to know what he knows about the situation, and I'm sure the other people involved have their own experience with it. It's not like this is somebody that's been prosecuted and found guilty of something, and you can then go, ‘I don't support this lifestyle or whatever.’ I mean, it's all guesswork.”

Johansson is also the subject of a new New Yorker profile, which shied away from her new pregnancy — her publicist was in the room during the interview — but did briefly touch on the Allen situation.

When asked whether she'd work with the filmmaker again, Johansson, described as a loyal fan in the story, said, “I don't see why anyone wouldn't.”

  • http://www.facebook.com/gerard.kennelly Gerard Kennelly

    hot stars with upcoming movies defending a child molester ?
    emma stone spider man 2
    scar jo captain america 2

    • Exetarian

      Molester? According to whom? Not the law. Do you have evidence and proof that the law didn't have 20 years ago? No? Then keep your judgmental judgments to yourself. Innocent until proved guilty. That's our system. It's not just good law, it's good manners.

      • MoListener

        O.J. was proved “not guilty,” but lots of people still think he was. Do they have bad manners for saying so? The fact is, juries get it wrong all the time. Prosecutors sometimes prosecute innocent people, and sometimes guilty people are never even brought to trial. Pretending otherwise is neither good law nor good manners.

        • Exetarian

          OJ was put on trial. Woody was never tried. He was only accused. It's time everyone stop appointing themselves judge and jury just because the Internet lets us spout our opinions. When you traffic an accusation as if it were fact, your'e contributing to a toxic social discourse that fosters slander, character assassination and the subversion of the judicial process in favor of tabloid rumor-mongering. Stop it.

      • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

        There was enough proof to go to court 20 years ago. Dylan wasn't strong enough to do it then, she was a 7 year old victim. No one is calling to lock Allen up, but that doesn't mean we can't judge him. I absolutely judge him.

        • Exetarian

          That's just rhetoric. If you believe that any prosecutor worth their salt would back off of convicting a celebrity if they had the chance, and risk leaving other potential victims exposed, then you're living on the moon. If there is sufficient proof to bring a case to trial, that case is brought. If there isn't, then it's not. Done. End of story. So yes, that does mean you SHOULD NOT judge him. If you choose to judge him, then you're a judgmental ass and you're inviting others to judge you just as harshly if and when someone makes an irresponsible, unsubstantiated and unjustifiable accusation against you. Is that the kind of society you want? Where all it takes to destroy someone and invite the scorn from the court of public opinion is to lob an accusation? What a horrible world you're inviting. Go get a hobby and do some good instead of “judging.” This judgmental society will be the death of all of us.

          • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

            Look up the stats on how the system deals with perverts like Allen and then get back to me. If you think that this situation is unique or special you are on the moon. Pedophiles count on their victims being undependable witnesses and the fact that prosecutors are willing to make deals with the devil to keep these little victims from testifying. Anyone with any sort of experience or dealings with these situations knows this.

            These cases get plead out of court daily. If Allen were just any schmuck he would have been pressured to plead down the charges and do a smaller sentence. That is how the system works in these cases.

            Stop your ignorant blathering, some of us aren't so naive that we do not know our arses from a hole in the ground. I will give you the benefit of the doubt and not assume you aren't some paid troll that Allen's PR firm has hired to spew tired talking points designed to discredit his own daughter.. a daughter he victimized and violated. I believe her. I do not give a flying fat if you believe her.

          • Exetarian

            Woody Allen has never been accused, before or since, of any illegalities of any kind. He has not even been accused by Dylan of but one particular instance. An instance of suspect timing given the custody battle in which he was engaged with Mia Farrow at the time. If anyone is entitled to fight this out, it is the parties involved. You and I are not party to it and to dive in and make a judgement independent of the court system is irresponsible. I'm not asking you to not have an opinion. I'm asking everyone to butt out of an affair that isn't their own. NO ONE who has not been convicted of a crime in a court of law should have their reputations and careers and lives destroyed based on hearsay, rumor and innuendo. There are certainly more than enough cases of people who have used baseless and reckless accusations as revenge against former lovers to make anyone with a conscience realize that we do our system a disservice by perpetuating the idea of un-indicted guilt. This stuff belongs in tabloids.

          • highcourt

            forget Woody Allen– I go by Mia Farrow– if she had the remotest chance to win in criminal court .. she would have pursued Woody to high heavens.. even if it means for Dylan getting older.. instead they allowed the statue to EXPIRE.. as the had no case.. THEY NEVER HAD A CASE.. NOT EVEN CIVIL COURT.

          • Chris

            A judge decided to not prosecute even though his findings let him to believe that there was enough evidence to convict Allen. There was no court case because Dylan was 7 and according to the judge was already traumatized by Allen's grossly inappropriate behavior towards her.
            Allen lost 4 times to get custody of his kids.

          • highcourt

            I'm so sooooooo sick & tired of this repeat of this judge.. that may have been true supposedly in 1992 when Dylan was 7– but they had till she was 20 –to pursue a criminal case..certainly Mia would have made sure of it– & fry allen's butt in court– did they? NO! that's enough answer– THERE WASN'T REALLY ANY CASE.. & whatever probable cause this judge was saying –will not stand in a trial.

          • s8800ss

            No, charges can only be brought, like a year, after a complaint.

          • s8800ss

            “forget Woody Allen– I go by Mia Farrow– if she had the remotest chance to win in criminal court ..”

            Mia Farrow doesn't decide whether cases are prosecuted, highcourt.
            Dylan could have filed a lawsuit, but perhaps she was too fragile to do so. Many child rape victims, like dylan farrow, don't want money, either–only the satisfaction of their abusers punishment. And she lost that chance when the case wasnt prosecuted when she was 7.

          • highcourt

            Iwas talking when she got older. she had till 20 to file & with the help of Mama Mia.. made sure there was a criminal trial.. fact remains.. after all was said & done. there was NO.. evidence to even charge Allen.. what they had was what?/ not much..
            the boys molested by Mia;s brother went to the police when they got older in their mid-teens.. Mia's brother started molesting themfrom age 8..he's in prison now.
            that's what happens when a person/s have a real case..
            this Dylan brouhaha has been nothing but for Woody allen falling in love wth Soon Yi.. if he didn't? there won't be any Dylan allegations.

          • Chris

            Most abuse victims don't come out until their 40, because the shock of the abuse sits very deep. She can still file a civil suit I think. I hope she will one day. Woody Allen is a sick creep.

          • highcourt

            hell.. don't compare this case with true molested victims.why I don't believe any of it.. it's all contrived,done to smear Allen & a vendetta.
            nothing more.Dylan coming out I take wirh a grain of salt. she is a budding writer & wants to be famous to sell books.

          • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

            Your hatred of Mia Farrow has completely blinded you.

          • highcourt

            on the contrary– I was a Mia fan since the 1960's–so I pretty much followed her life & career. Neither,am I blind.. this lastest– showed me what rubbish this whole allegations are/were all about & seeing it for what it is– a media smear campaign against Woody Allen for their own personal gain & attention..because.. truly— what else do they have to get attention for themselves?

          • Chris

            Don't you get it, this has nothing to do with Mia Farrow. It was not her who instigated the child abuse accusations, It was a child psychiatrist/doctor who by law was required to report the abuse to the police.

            Woody Allen lost 4 appeals to discredit Mia Farrow, and he failed in all of them.

            Stick to the facts!

          • highcourt

            rubbish.. Mia started this whole drama. no wonder she was busy video taping Dylan for 3 whole days.. if Dylan were genuinely molested she would have gone to police at once.. not 3 days of shoot. Mia reminds me of Evan Chandler the father of the boy who accused MJ.. after Mj refused to make a film deal with him for $20 mil.. with Mia.. Woody & Soon Yi fell in love.

    • rapeiswwrong

      Boycott the projects of emma stone and Scarlett Johansson. I will be doing so.

    • Joe Boo

      What has Emma Stone said in defense of Woody Allen?

      • http://www.facebook.com/gerard.kennelly Gerard Kennelly

        emma stone wasn't born yesterday
        her presence at the GG is an insult to the people woody abused

  • Stuart W

    Well of course when you are looking for a reliable source, none better than Mia Farrow and her “purest goals”. Whatever means to whatever ends not entirely stated; in that which The Wrap has questionably labeled- “debate”. There exists little reasoning in this ongoing hate-fest bearing small resemblance to what might be described as reasoned, unbiased truth-seeking. Just yards of “she says’ “he says” comments revealing an intense animus which has openly severed and/or destroyed existing households and filial relationships. Truth appears never to have been the issue; naked revenge the underlying cause. Any attempt at an honest, clean and clear result totally poisoned decades-prior.

    Enough already!

  • Anders

    It really doesn't matter if you think it was for revenge or whatever. The fact is a child was molested. Charges may have been dropped but that doesn't make someone innocent. The prosecutor and the judge do believe she was molested but couldn't stand trial by her own omission. That without a doubt sounds like he was guilty. Furthermore he had nude photos of his current wife when she was underage, sounds like thats fishy too. But because everyone is so angry with Mia Farrow for being angry at her ex husband a pedophile gets free run on the world.

    • hupto

      “The fact is a child was molested.”

      Nope, it's an accusation. If it were a fact, it would have led to his arrest, trial and probable conviction. Prisons (including death rows) have been (and still are) full of convicted people who were ultimately proven innocent, so the fact that no arrest was ever made means it remains an accusation and nothing more.

      • Sitamsini Cherukumalli

        - Woody refused the state's lie detector test in favor of his own.
        - The report done on Dylan he says “confirms” she wasn't molested? Openly questioned by the judge during the custody battle, someone who had never met Dylan testified about it while 2 other social workers refused to. ALL of the assessment paperwork was also destroyed. Is that not suspicious? They drew conclusions about Ronan and Mia without having met them either in the report.
        - Woody NEVER got custody of his kids and was reprimanded for abusive and manipulative behavior during the custody hearing. He was only granted visitation under extreme supervision.
        - Dylan NEVER changed her story.
        - The prosecutor didn't charge Woody to spare Dylan, not because he was confirmed innocent.
        - A family therapist had warned Woody's fixation on Dylan was too close AGES before any accusation was made.
        - Moses Farrow is the only one of Mia's 12 children to speak out against her. 8 contributed to the notorious Vanity Fair article.

        • hupto

          None of that is even remotely viable as evidence. Look, if he's guilty, I'll gladly volunteer to lock him up and throw away the key, but until it can be PROVEN, he's innocent in the eyes of the law.

          • Glory

            Woody is wildly suspicious and I see no tangible proof Mia has anywhere near the level of cover-ups he does or the evasions he does, she and Dylan have zero incentive and haven't earned a dime off this story. Why should I turn a blind eye to that in lieu of a conviction?

            I don't reserve my opinions till they pass through the judicial system and neither do you. Michael Jackson, OJ Simpson, Casey Anthony, George Zimmerman….they went to court and came off scot-free. How do you feel about them?

          • hupto

            Sigh. THEY WENT TO COURT. Woody hasn't even been arrested, much less indicted. Why is this so difficult to grasp?

            Google “innocent until proven guilty.”

          • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

            This isn't a courtroom. I believe he is a creepy pervert and a pedophile. I believe his daughter.

          • Joe Boo

            You're right, it's not a courtroom. However, for some foolish reason, many people in this country still believe in the presumption of innocence. Since the charges were never pursued, although they could have been filed until Dylan was 20 years old, all we have is speculation, which some have turned into a certainty that he is guilty. Please forgive the rest of us that are not so quick to condemn someone as a pedophile.

          • highcourt

            I just love how the same people so quick to condemn Woody Allen easily ignores Mia's brother whose actually the pedophile…charged,convicted & in prison..

          • Chris

            Yep, and Woody Allen hangs out with Roman Polanski. Whats your point? I have a brother who is a piece of shit, I am not responsible for any of his action.

          • highcourt

            well.. considering the accusations leveled on Woody then her brother is like that? another committed suicide? Mia herself.. hmmmm… she came from a very dysfunctional family steeped in neurosis– it is not beneath her that she would invent these allegations to get even for Woody falling in love with soon yi

          • highcourt

            more reason your opinions don't matter.. we are dealing with FACTS.
            THE Pedophile is Mia's brother.

          • highcourt

            really??? Mia Farrow is on a lecture tour exploiting woody Allen..
            Dylan .. the budding writer.. looking for a publisher with a huge advance & getting name recognition with the public.
            Ronan was debuting his show….
            who said they weren't getting any $$$ from this?

          • leden

            Or not: “Farrow’s talk was titled “Having a Meaningful Life: One Woman’s Journey to Fulfillment,” and it traced her life from being the daughter of Hollywood “royalty” to working with Unicef to bring attention and aid to children caught up in the horrors of war.”

          • highcourt

            oh she touched on Woody–& she wouldn'tbe on that tour nor get offers if it wasn't for Woody Allen– why Ronan started tweeting last year..to get noticed.. they all just went on from there.

          • leden

            You're a liar. People have called you out on it repeatedly (for the same lies over and over and over) on pretty much every story published about Woody Allen recently. Get a life – maybe go to one of Mia Farrow's talks, it sounds inspirational and really interesting.

          • highcourt

            why don'tyou follow your own advise as you keep revealing yourself

          • leden

            People tweet to get noticed? No! Get out of town!

            Everyone knows Twitter was all about privacy and disengaging from the public discourse… oh, wait.

            Mia and Ronan were both born famous – Hollywood royalty. Neither needs Woody Allen. Clearly.

          • highcourt

            geez.. where have you been? it was Ronan who started tweeting last year,, that his father..
            was also his father in law knowing it'll gain media attention.. UNTIL THEN.. NO ONE WAS EVER SAYING ANYTHING ABOUT HIM.. whose Ronan anyway–when he was Satchel Allen.. if anyone is LYING.. it is YOU!

          • leden

            What?! No one was talking about him while he was studying at Oxford? Horrors!

            But after he graduated, started a new chapter as a public figure working as a journalist and writing a book on U.S. foreign policy -then- people started talking about him? What are the odds?!

          • highcourt

            he wasn't a household name– he had to tweet about Woody Allen as he did 2013 Valentine;s day to bring attention to himself. & tweeting away culminating with the Golden Globes with his mummy dearest & from that Dylan coming out with her Open letter. all orchestrated to bring attention to themselves.

          • leden

            Um… he's still not a household name.

            And as you so cleverly point out – he's been tweeting about Woody Allen for years. Nothing new here.

            He wrote a book on U.S. foreign policy that was always going to have a very limited audience and he has an afternoon show on MSNBC. He's up against shows on other news networks and those shows, probably, have hosts – no one knows who any of those people are either.

            Half the commenters on these stories about Woody Allen don't even know his name or they assume he is Dylan.

            Your assertion that this is all some sort of orchestrated media blitz is refuted by reality

          • highcourt

            AGREE…hell I didn't even know his name became ronan from satchel..nor what he looked like.. he's been making swipes at Woody's expense since last year– which isn't nice when that guy paid for his upkeep & education.

        • leden

          We've never seen the results from the lie detector test Woody Allen and his lawyer said he took and passed.

          Isn't that a little odd since they lean so heavily on it when they try to discredit the allegations?

          Just wanted to add that because it always bothers me.

          • highcourt

            regardless.. Mia Farrow wasn't able to sue Allen .. so there's your answer..

          • leden

            You're stomping your feet while you post all of your little tantrums, aren't you?

          • highcourt

            wow.. flattering yourself? you haven't the means ..lolol..

      • Jake P Hall

        In July 1993 NY Supreme Court issued a 39 page ruling regarding custody of the Farrow/Allen children. It is available to the public and is a matter of public record. Woody Allen tried to appeal the twice and lost both times. Farrow was awarded custody 3 times. Reading the ruling it becomes very clear that Woody Allen emotionally and mentally abused all of the children in the Farrow household and Mia (the mother of 3 of Mr. Allen's children). “Emotional Incest” is real and damaging. Woody's relationship with Mia's adopted daughter Soon Yi Previn, was just another example of what little regard Mr. Allen had for other people, healthy relationships, and appropriate behavior. If Scarlett, Emma, and Cate, want to work for someone who mentally and emotionally abuses people, that is their business. But, why defend if you don't feel guilty?

        • highcourt

          Ronan is not his son if what Mia said is true– he's Frankie.. If thise kids were emotionally abused.. it's also Mia going around the bend with he went with soon Yi.

          • chris

            Mia was not Frank Sinatra's daughter, they were married.
            Soon Yi was the sister of the daughter of Allen's GF.

          • highcourt

            I already know Mia alludes Ronan is Frankie's son.

      • Chris

        A fact is that Allen had a sexual relationship with the 35 year younger sister of his own daughter when she was 19.

        A fact is that Allen said in a 1976 People magazine interview
        “I mean, if I was caught in a love nest with 15 12-year-old girls tomorrow, people would think, yeah, I always knew that about him. Nothing I could come up with would surprise anyone, I admit to it all.”

        A fact is also that the presiding custody judge ruled Allen's behavior towards Dylan as “grossly inappropriate” and he was never given custody of his own kids.

        • highcourt

          you realize it was Mia who wanted him to adopt Moses & Dylan? the judge had biase bec if the Ssoin yi affair,

          • Chris

            You have the most twisted sense of justice. Nothing you say sounds reasonable.

          • highcourt

            what's your justice? convict a man that was NEVER even BEEN CHARGED?
            if anyone is twisted/ it's you & your ilk.

        • s8800ss

          He committed grotesque acts of incest with soon yi.

          Judge Wilk ruled theirs was not a relationship between consenting adults.

          • highcourt

            who the hell was that judge to even comment on Soon Yi & allen.. she was 19-20 when they started dating & 27 when she married woody.

        • http://www.facebook.com/gerard.kennelly Gerard Kennelly

          don't forget he lied to the police
          he said he was never in the attic crawl space
          then they found his fingerprints there

  • Bob Strauss

    Now is spelled now.

  • Estelle55

    Mia is a bitter, vengeful woman who has nothing in her life since the kids are grown. Allen not only took a lie detector test (I know not admissible but boy they sure use it in a lot of arrest cases) and what has Mia done? Heck what has Dylan done? Come out an say these things over 20 years later? PULEEZE. Can it Mia. The police knew he was innocent, End of story. Find a new way to get publicity. This last accusation got your son a job with CNN. Which kid are you trying to get a job for now?

    • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

      Allen took a lie detector test that he bought and paid for. He wouldn't submit to one administered by the police who were investigating him. Oh, I know, only people Allen pays can be trusted and all the people who get paid for by the state cannot be trusted… meaning the cops who investigated him who said there was probable cause to move forward with a prosecution, the prosecutor, and the child custody judge.

      How much is Allen's PR firm paying you to cut and paste his talking points? He has nothing new, just bash Mia and hope his cr @p slinging stains his child victims, because that is what pedophiles do, they count on people not believing their vulnerable victims. He is a cretin

      • Estelle55

        And how fast would Mia star in a film by Roman Polanski if he asked her? He is a CONVICTED Pedophile just like her brother yet you are going after someone who WAS NOT convicted. Is this really what this country has come to?

        • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

          This isn't about Mia, it is about Woody Allen's daughter who says he violated her. You can keep on replying and trying to make this about Mia, as if any of your BS justifies a man in his 50s violating his 7 year old child, but that doesn't wash with anyone that has a clue

          • Joe Boo

            To believe that this doesn't have to do with Mia Farrow is incredibly naive. Her questionable acts are directly related to determining the reliability of the evidence offered in support of Dylan's claim.

          • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

            Do you get paid by the comment?

          • highcourt

            are you in Mia's?

          • Joe Boo

            Kudos for your persistence (given how old the post is), but you've already lost. Better luck next time.

          • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

            How very sick you are, publicly supporting a pervert.

          • Joe Boo

            Does the facility you're in know you're using the computer?

          • Joe Boo

            Does the facility you're in know that you're using the computer?

      • Joe Boo

        You can tell when a person's argument is truly without merit when they state things like, “How much is Allen's PR firm paying you..” Parroting the Farrow talking points is okay, but disagreeing with the Farrow clan or defending Woody Allen means you're a shill. Truly pathetic.

        • Chris

          I think you are naive if you don't believe Allen's PR people trolling the message boards.

          BTW, why did Allen never filed for slander after Dylan's public accusations?

          • Joe Boo

            I don't know whether there are PR people on here or not. Regardless, if someone disagrees with a comment, accusing someone of being a shill demonstrates an inability to form a valid response, instead attacking the person.

            My guess why Allen won't file a defamation suit: 1) the cost, 2) the time commitment required, 3) the continuing spotlight on the allegations, and 4) the difficulty proving defamation.

            The better question is why Dylan Farrow has not filed a civil suit.

          • chris

            I think most people who still despise Allen and don't find him credible just means they are not being manipulated by Allen's PR people.

            I don't know how anybody with 2 working brain cells left doesn't think there is something seriously wrong with Allen.

            Maybe the ones still defending him are in some entitled pedo club. I hear it is a big industry around the world.

          • highcourt

            Mia's brother just joined the Pedo Club.

          • highcourt

            EXACTLY!!!!! what I have saying all along..

  • Bo

    Those who believe that Mr. Allen is guilty are ignorant; uniformed and unaware. Those that think he is innocent are also ignorant. Those that know that they don't know what happened and therefore do not take actions against either party are healthy and awake. To take actions, especially against Mr. Allen by not going to any of his movies, is extremely dysfunctional and reveals more about the person(s) who would think and then act out of their ignorance and unawareness. Which one might define as evil. Ignorance is not only the root of evil, but it also allows the evil to continue and to grow. Look, it really indicates how most people operate out of fear without knowing or being in contact with their fears. Shall we burn more women at the stake because we fear they are witches? Or wreck havoc on Jews again? Or slaughter more Native American Indians? Or enslave more of the black race? Or bomb and kill more innocent civilains in the Middle East using Drones? Oh, wait…
    we are doing that now…right this second innocent civilians are being slaughtered out of our fears of the big, bad terriorist! Ignorance! Evil! Still thriving and revealing itself in people's judgments and reactions against others when being uninformed and unaware. Are you one of them?

  • Martin B

    Mia's brother and Roman Polanski were proven in court to be pedophiles and yet she defends them. Woody has not been convicted, but he is the only one she speaks out against. Some ethics, Mia.

    • Glory

      Mia Farrow was estranged from her brother and she was called to testify for Roman Polanski because there were accusation made in a Vanity Fair article that mentioned a specific event Mia was present for. You're completely wrong.

      • Joe Boo

        No, Mia is a “close friend” of Roman Polanski. She tried to backtrack during the recent blow up with the allegations against Woody Allen, but her comments around the time she testified for Polanski are more credible.

        • highcourt

          I agree. she was also close to her brother.he was the one busy damning Allen in 1992 over Dylan..he projected what happened to him.

      • leden

        You are totally right, Glory.

        Why do Allen's supporters keep trying to perpetuate these obvious falsehoods? Are they unaware that it is 2014 and not 1992? We all have Google now – we can look anything up in a few seconds.

        • highcourt

          still the bottomline–inspite of all those supposed records it wouldn't withstand a real cross examine in the court of law.. why Mia & Dylan allowed the statue to expire.

          • leden

            If the only way you can defend him is by lying then you're just proving that he is indefensible.

          • highcourt

            ha,,, ha,, but you glaringly fail to answer– WAS ALLLEN EVEN C HARGED much less CONVICTED? a resounding NO.. BUT MIA'S BROTHER IS,, oh yeah,, his wife–Mia's sister in law called those boys who came forward as VIPERS ,horrible people.. wasn't that lovely of her????? calling those truly abused boys for standing for themselves.. Then there;s people like you who condemn a man who wasn't even charged..
            whose indefensible?? YOU ARE! & incorrigible in your demented way of thinking,,

    • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

      No matter what you think of Mia, it is DYLAN making these allegations, not her mother.

      • MSD

        Blah, blah, blah. Anyone who can write well can scream abuse and all you raving lunatics with mental health problems will support the mentally unstable idiot. Slither back to the filth you came from!

        • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

          Woody Allen has admitted to being mentally ill.

          • highcourt

            you do realize he is a comedian? it's called self-deprecation.

          • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

            He is an admitted claustrophobe, he has anxiety disorders, and that is a form of mental illness.

            It is amusing how you can slam Mia Farrow so endlessly for the sin of not wanting a mentally ill pervert seducing her teenage daughter and molesting her 7 year old daughter. You do not have very high standards of behavior. You endlessly are devoted to making that behavior acceptable. Well, it isn't.

          • highcourt

            gee.. Woody Allen never made any secret of his phobias– he actually made a career of it as almost all good comedians do..
            as you keep making assumptions– was he charged,convicted .imprisoned??hell NO. as you keep lambasting him.. then it is YOU who has a low threshold in character.

    • Chris

      This story is not about Mia Farrow, who made a lot of mistakes during her relationship with Allen, I am sure. This is about Woody Allen being an predatory child molester. All of you who are being so certain Allen is nothing but a victim in this family dispute, I want to see you leaving your kids unattended with Allen for an afternoon.

      • highcourt

        he is not a child molestor– accused isNOT FACT.

  • Madly

    Mia is tired of being out of the media and for these last months has brought up an issue long since put to bed. Mia is longing for attention and is reliably lashing out at her long time nemesis for some media time and, it seems, in time for some attention grabbing for her son's show on MSNBC. If my child was the victim of a pedophile, I don't think time would've passed without my making sure that person was behind bars.

    • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

      DYLAN brought it up, Mia is supporting her daughter… I bet you think that mothers shouldn't support their children.

      • highcourt

        get over it.. Mia fingerprints was all over that Dylan letter.. &b wouldn't be published it weren't for Mia Farrow.

        • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

          How much is Woody's PR firm paying you?

          • highcourt

            is that all you can say & come with?? pathetic !
            better question is– HOW MUCH IS MIA PAYING YOU?

          • highcourt

            better question is– how much is Mia paying you?

    • highcourt

      yeah.. Mia is now busy on a lecture touR talking about what else? WOODY ALLEN!
      she was just in Tulsa.

  • Glory

    - Woody refused the state's lie detector test in favor of his own.
    - The report done on Dylan he says “confirms” she wasn't molested? Openly questioned by the judge during the custody battle, someone who had never met Dylan testified about it while 2 other social workers refused to. ALL of the assessment paperwork was also destroyed. Is that not suspicious? They drew conclusions about Ronan and Mia without having met them either in the report.
    - Woody NEVER got custody of his kids and was reprimanded for abusive and manipulative behavior during the custody hearing. He was only granted visitation under extreme supervision.
    - Dylan NEVER changed her story.
    - The prosecutor didn't charge Woody to spare Dylan, not because he was confirmed innocent.
    - A family therapist had warned Woody's fixation on Dylan was too close AGES before any accusation was made.
    - Moses Farrow is the only one of Mia's 12 children to speak out against her. 8 contributed to the notorious Vanity Fair article.

    • Sitamsini Cherukumalli

      I hope you don't mind that copy paste this comment in response to all the idiots on this page

      • highcourt

        when Maureen Orth gets into the act– you know the other side will WIN..

    • highcourt

      TALKING TO Maureen Orth?? laughable.. she's nothing but a hack.She was so sure Michael Jackson will end up in prison.. with all her biased reporting.. WHAT HAPPENED? MJJ was acquitted on ALL COUNTS.. that's Maureen Orth's reporting for ya'.. it doesn't have any leg in court
      each time I read her name — all I can see is her damn face when MJ was acquitted.. THAT LOOK WORTH a million..

    • http://www.facebook.com/gerard.kennelly Gerard Kennelly

      don't forget he lied to the police
      he said he was never in the attic crawl space
      then they found his fingerprints there

  • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

    The real question: Would ScarJo leave her daughter with him?

    • highcourt

      I bet she will– she's done 3 films for him.

      • Chris

        Yes and she was terrible in all of them!

        • highcourt

          NO WONDER it's always on cable

    • Chris

      The woman is a complete opportunistic bimbo who will do anything for cash and fame. She also loves to kiss up to Roman Polanski and Donald Trump.

      One good think coming out of her recent remarks is that the controversy around Allen will still be in the media. I bet Allen loves that when his next movie will come out later this year.

  • Steven Kaye

    Mia Farrow looks terrible. As ugly on the outside as she is on the inside.

    • highcourt

      she hasn't age well

      • Chris

        Yeah sure and Woody Allen looks like a Greek Adonis.

        • highcourt

          actually Allen has aged well– he looks distinguished now he's gotten old.. as he was never god looking & have a comedians face.

          • http://www.facebook.com/julia.oceania Julia Oceania

            He is an ugly shrunken toad

          • highcourt

            not from whose fallen in love with him.. hell even Mia chased him.. & Diane Keaton.

        • highcourt

          actually he got distinguished as he got older,

  • MSD

    Oh please. Mia has serious mental health issues. The whole time she was claiming to be a subjugated woman she was sleeping with Frank Sinatra. Woody Allen and she weren't even living together. Then when everything fell apart and no one gave her any movie roles mostly because she was a nut case, she turned to the only thing these mental nut jobs do when they don't know what else to do with their lives: save Africa ( which by the way Africans hate) because it makes their miserable life a little better. Then she adopts kids like litters. That Dylan woman was probably licking the ground Mia walked on and trying to appease because a rich white woman adopted her. Why should we listen to Dylan and not her other brother who says Mia was a raving lunatic who would lash out at her kids? Why because he is a male? And women don't make up stories? And her son who is on MSNBC that everyone thinks is a self-made journalist but is nothing more than an elite who got the job because of his mother and who she knew is falling flat on the ground. Mia thought Ronan was her way back to relevance but he is failing miserably and the only thing she has now is to constantly keep talking about Woody.

    • highcourt

      bravo.. Mia's neurosis was in full display with that Valentine card..

      • Chris

        I want to see what you do to the guy who sexually molested your 7 year old daughter and took pictures of your 20 year old daughters crotch.

        • highcourt

          goodness.. you will never make a juror.

    • s8800ss

      The person with serious mental health issues is Woody Allen who comitted incestuous coercive rape against his eldest stepdaughter and violently raped his young daughter.

      Woody Allen is a demented pedophile

  • highcourt

    “her purest goals.. ethics..? oh dear– she's having amnesia.. she conviniently forgets ‘stealing’ Andre Previn that his wife of long standing had to have shock treatments.

  • MonsieurVerdoux

    So when is Mia going to pay Woody back for all the child support she charged him for Frank Sinatra's son?

    • highcourt

      exactly.

    • IveSeenEnough

      Yup

    • byrn

      oh, i don't know, maybe when woody allen actually legally disputes paternity and takes a dna test that proves he's not the man's father…

      you know, instead of being a passive-aggressive whiner about it when it serves as a convenient distraction to the fact that he's being accused -again- of molesting his child.

      If he actually believes he's not ronan's father he's had a good 26 years to do something about it. tsk.tsk.

  • s8800ss

    Woody Allen is an incestuous, pedophile baby rapist. He raped his eldest, semi-retarded step daughter ,Soon Yi, and when that wasn't spicy enough, raped his youngest daughter, Dylan Farrow.

    Allen needs to be prosecuted

    • highcourt

      oh great.. let's see if that will stand in court??? HMMM….ehem.. HELL NO !!!! fact remains. he's never charged.. arrested.. nothing..
      next..

      • Bev Mabry

        the truth is not always provable in a court of law. I believe where there is smoke there is probably fire and there's quite a bit of smoke around this man