SpinMedia Liquidates in Bid to Avoid Bankruptcy

SpinMedia Liquidates in Bid to Avoid Bankruptcy

Financially troubled company rechristened as Spin Media Group in reorganization

SpinMedia has undergone yet another transformation, after entering a liquidation that will have the company operating under a slightly different name.

According to papers obtained by TheWrap, SpinMedia — previously known as BuzzMedia, before that company acquired Spin Magazine in 2012 — is no more, with a new company, dubbed Spin Media Group Inc., taking over operations after the company.

Also read: SpinMedia Lays Off Substanial Number of Employees

The change-over took place after SpinMedia went into default with its secured lender, Silicon Valley Bank — to which SpinMedia owed more than $12 million — and was unable to find another suitable buyer.

According to a bulletin obtained by TheWrap, SpinMedia had pledged “substantially all of its assets as collateral” to Silicon Valley Bank.

The liquidation took place via a General Assignment, which is an alternative to filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy in California.

Also read: Layoffs Hit Huffington Post Entertainment as Part of Restructuring

The bulletin, dated Feb. 28, says that the newly formed Spin Media Group negotiated to purchase “substantially all of Spin's tangible and intangible assets” for $7,002,428.98 in cash, $774,537 in current employee wages and benefits, and  “the assumption of approximately $815,259 in accrued vacation pay and commissions.”

Spin has not yet responded to TheWrap's request for comment.

The new company, which has at least four shareholders who were also minority shareholders and officers of Spin, “has rehired nearly all of Spin's former employees, including its senior management.”

Also read: AOL Patch Layoffs Begin, Nearly 500 Expected to Go

Investors in the company through its various permutations, meanwhile, appear to be out of luck. According to the New York Post, the liquidation and reorganization erases $125 million in equity that venture firms have poured into the company. While some investors are re-upping to invest in the new company — and a new investor, TDF Venture Partners — has come aboard, former backer Red Point Ventures has declined to throw more money into the company, the Post said.

Spin, whose websites include Celebuzz, the Superficial, Buzznet and Idolator, has encountered difficult economic times — the bulletin notes that the company reported “significant operating losses” in recent years. In October, laying off a significant portion of its workforce, including then-editorial director A.J. Daulerio, a slashing that followed the layoffs of 50 staffers in February 2013.

  • astralislux

    I've never heard of the sites it operates.

    • andreana mccann

      My Uncle James recently got a new black
      Mazda MAZDASPEED3 Hatchback by working at home online. you can try here

  • Benjamin Roussey

    Outstanding work.

  • Benjamin Roussey

    Romney was right on about Russia and the Ukraine. Again, the Obama machine was
    wrong and even mocked Romney about it. Hilarious. Liberals just do not
    understand foreign policy. Obama is a punk and a very slow learner. Obama, your
    weakness on Syria has just caused an international crisis in the Ukraine. Good
    job, another black mark on your record where there is very little bright spots.

  • Benjamin Roussey

    We had a good economy in the 90's
    because Clinton was forced to balance a budget by Newt Gingrich and the
    Republicans. Obama refuses to do so with Harry Reid. There was no socialized
    health care in the 90s, there is now. That is 2 reasons why the 90s are good
    and the teens, the present time, are not good. Do you understand this simple

    There was not any Dodd/Frank or
    Sarbanes Oxley (2 major regulations that are killing jobs) in the 90s. The EPA
    is far more powerful in their job killing abilities now than they were in the
    90s. The point is, Obama cannot obtain or recreate the Clinton economy until he
    is ready to eliminate Obamacare, dump the Dodd/Frank rule which is killing
    small business, and ditch Sarbanes Oxley. Obama would not do this in 300 years.
    Obama does not care about improving the economy, he wants to make more people
    dependent on the government to survive. If Obama wanted to improve the economy
    he would have called up Steve Forbes.

  • Benjamin Roussey

    There are jobs in Texas and Florida
    and not in California or any other state ran by liberals. Why? It really is not
    that hard to figure out. High taxes and excessive regulations are job killers.
    If you care about prosperity or job creation, voting liberal does not make any
    sense. Societies with lower taxes, and this is proven throughout the ages, that
    levy lower taxes thrive; societies that levy high taxes and regulations kill
    jobs and opportunity for their people. This is why the Sarbanes Oxley, EPA
    rules, Dodd/Frank, our ridiculous tax code, Obamacare, all have to be curtailed
    or cut back. If not, you will have a pathetic economy like we do now. Good job
    Texas and other conservative states for leading the way. California, Illinois,
    New York, you deserve to crumble and you are because you continue to vote into
    office clueless job killing politicians.