‘Menendez Murders’ Star Reacts to Leslie Abramson Not Being a Fan of ‘Law & Order’ Series
“If I were her, I’d be pretty flattered,” Sam Jaeger tells TheWrap
Ryan Gajewski | November 14, 2017 @ 5:41 PM
Last Updated: November 17, 2017 @ 11:35 AM
“Law & Order True Crime: The Menendez Murders” actor Sam Jaeger is weighing in on defense attorney Leslie Abramson not being a fan of the NBC true-crime drama.
Before the Dick Wolf-created limited series premiered in September, Abramson told TheWrap she did not plan to watch the show that stars Edie Falco as Abramson, who represented Erik Menendez in two murder trials in the 1990s. Erik and his brother Lyle were charged with murdering their parents. The retired attorney did not give a reason for not wanting to watch.
“I still sense that if she ever did see it — if I were her, I’d be pretty flattered because I think they did paint her in a light that is far more positive than any other project before it,” Jaeger, who plays Detective Les Zoeller, told TheWrap. “Whether that should be the case or not, I guess I’m not at liberty to say.”
“I think she comes across as a very driven person who really believed in her client,” the “Parenthood” alum added. He pointed out that Abramson was not involved in production on the series.
As far as the show itself, Jaeger said that it gives a “much more sympathetic view of the brothers than we’ve seen before,” and that it could impact viewers’ impression of Erik and Lyle, who are currently serving life sentences.
But his biggest hope is that the series encourages people to think about abuse in general. (The defense team argued that the murders were a retaliation for suffering abuse by their parents.)
“If there’s anything I want people to take from it, it’s to open up a discussion about sex abuse, about shame and about where we come from, how we grew up — how does that impact who we are,” Jaeger said. “Abuse is prevalent, and the more we expose it, the more we discuss it, and the more the victims feel that they have a voice, the closer we are to helping society deal with abuse.”
This story has been updated from its original version. “Law & Order True Crime: The Menendez Murders” airs its finale on Tuesday at 10/9c on NBC.
7 Questions We Still Have About the Menendez Trial Ahead of 'Law & Order True Crime' (Photos)
"Law & Order" has been known to take stories from headlines, but they've always done so with some liberties. Now, Dick Wolf and his franchise are tackling the Menendez trial, one of the most high-profile murder cases in the past 30 years. What makes this case so interesting for true crime fans, however, isn't just the crime itself but rather all the questions people still have decades later ahead of tonight's premiere at 10 p.m. on NBC.
Were they the victims of abuse?
This is probably the biggest question. The core of defense attorney Leslie Abramson's defense was that Lyle and Erik Menendez were driven to murder after a lifetime of abuse by their parents. Their father, José, was known to be strict and very controlling and the defense claimed that the two were also the victim of sexual abuse, but the only evidence that was circumstantial. Erik and Lyle had never discussed it with anybody ahead of the trial.
NBC
Who was the mastermind?
The going theory is that Lyle, the older of the brothers, was the mastermind behind the killings. He's normally seen by experts and observers as somebody with a bad temper and with sociopathic tendencies (although he's never been diagnosed). Erik confessed to the killings in a session with his therapist, L. Jerome Oziel, but Lyle eventually threatened Oziel. However, Erik wrote a screenplay before the murders about a rich man who murders his parents for money.
NBC
What was the real reason?
The on-the-record reason is that Lyle and Erik killed their parents after years of sexual and physical abuse, but since that evidence is circumstantial, the jury is still out on the real motivations, so to speak. Another going theory is that the brothers did it for money, since both spent a lot in the months after the murders -- almost $700,000 according to Vanity Fair.
NBC
What's the deal with the guns?
Erik testified that he and his brother went to a Santa Monica store to purchase handguns for protection, yet were told there was a 15-day waiting period. However, in cross examination, lawyers said that the store the duo claimed to visit had stopped selling guns three years before the murders took place. Erik and Lyle then bought shotguns.
NBC
Did the authorities screw up?
The police didn't immediately test the brothers for gunshot residue at the crime scene, which is one strike against authorities, but there is also suspicion that the judge and the District Attorney were colluding with each other. Since many believed the abuse defense, it always confused people, including Abramson, how the two got life sentences.
NBC
Did Abramson lie?
Abramson certainly became as big a part of the Menendez story as the brothers themselves. However, following the main trial, she became the target of accusations that she tampered with evidence. Dr. William Vicary, Erik's psychiatrist, specifically said that he had deleted notes of his sessions with the accused "under pressure by the defense." The State Bar of California closed its investigation because of insufficient evidence.
NBC
Will Abramson or others watch the show?
Well according to Abramson, who spoke with TheWrap ahead of the premiere, that's a no. But what about the brothers? Both are still alive.
NBC
1 of 8
The high-profile case is still fascinating decades later
"Law & Order" has been known to take stories from headlines, but they've always done so with some liberties. Now, Dick Wolf and his franchise are tackling the Menendez trial, one of the most high-profile murder cases in the past 30 years. What makes this case so interesting for true crime fans, however, isn't just the crime itself but rather all the questions people still have decades later ahead of tonight's premiere at 10 p.m. on NBC.
NBC
