Following the critical pans and underperforming box office of “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,” Warner Bros. has switched things up, putting executive vice presidents Jon Berg and Geoff Johnsin charge of it DC Films unit, according to an individual familiar with the studio’s operations.
It’s easy to read that as an informal demotion for Zack Snyder, whose direction of “Man of Steel” “BvS,” and 2017’s “Justice League” had — until now — made him the de facto overlord of Warner Bros.’ DC Comics movies. At the very least, it is a retreat from the auteur approach that worked well for the studio with the Christopher Nolan-directed “Dark Knight” trilogy. (Though studio sources maintain Warner Bros. remains focused on a filmmaker-centric approach.)
“That’s a great strategy when you have Chris Nolan,” said one senior film executive, who spoke to TheWrap on condition of anonymity.
The executive noted that the approach also worked for Marvel’s first two “Iron Man” films, which were directed by Jon Favreau, who further proved his abilities with this spring’s Disney hit “The Jungle Book.”
But aside from Favreau and Joss Whedon, director of the first two “Avengers” movies, Marvel has not placed its superhero properties in the hands of any lone filmmaker to the extent that Warner/DC has. The auteur approach is especially risky given how much Warner Bros. depends on DC Comics for key tentpole movies.
“They know they have a problem,” the executive said. “They have way too much riding on the DC movies.”
The fate of Marvel’s heroes lies not with individual directors, but with Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige, who oversees an elaborate, overlapping cinematic universe in which individual directors are offered limited autonomy. Now Warner Bros., like Marvel owner Disney, seems ready to put more power in the clutches of executives.
Berg will be president of DC Films, while Johns will remain DC Entertainment’s chief creative officer, but also jointly run DC Films — a move that suggests that the studio has decided to inch closer to the Disney-Marvel model without diving in head first.
Reps for Warner Bros. declined to comment for this story.
News of Berg and Johns’ evolved focus comes a month after Ben Affleck, who took on the role of Batman in “Batman v Superman,” was named as an executive producer on the upcoming “Justice League” movies. He will also direct a standalone Batman movie.
So how did the studio find itself in need of a new approach?
It could have been as simple as luck of the draw. Marvel took a huge gamble on Joss Whedon to direct the first “Avengers” movie, which was then set up at Paramount. But it paid off with a hit that grossed $1.5 billion worldwide.
There’s no understating the risk: At the time, Whedon had a bomb with the 2005 sci-fi adventure “Serenity.” And while Whedon had built a loyal cult fan base with TV hits like “Buffy the Vampire Slayer” and the genre-mixing space Western “Firefly,” he was far from a household name.
Similarly, Warner Bros. bet big for “Batman v Superman” on Snyder, who had a few bombs of his own to live down. The director had a hit with the stylized 2006 Grecco-Roman war film “300,” but he also directed flops like 2009’s “Watchmen,” 2010’s “Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga’Hoole” and 2011’s female-driven action movie “Sucker Punch.”
Neither his 2013 “Man of Steel” nor “BvS” have come close to the high billion-dollar-plus watermark set by movies in the Marvel universe. While “BvS” has grossed $870.1 million worldwide so far, that’s far short of what many analysts expected.
The movie’s performance is particularly crucial since Warner Bros. is ramping up production of additional DC Comics movies at a breakneck pace, with the supervillain mashup “Suicide Squad” due in August, two more movies hitting theaters in 2017 and three a year slated beginning in 2018.
That kind of output could be a serious change for the studio, which has released only four new DC Comics movies in the last five years: the misfire “Green Lantern,” Nolan’s “The Dark Knight Rises,” “Man of Steel” and “B v S.”
In that same time, Disney’s Marvel has released three Captain America movies, two Thors, “Iron Man 3,” “Ant-Man,” “Guardians of the Galaxy,” and two “Avengers” blockbusters — all of them hits.
The test for Warner Bros. is whether that kind of creative output is possible under a model that puts just a handful of directors in charge, and how much authority Berg and Johns will be able to exert on shaping a growing slate of overlapping properties.
Every Batman Movie Ranked, From Worst to Best (Photos)
We've arrived at the 30th anniversary of the release of Tim Burton's "Batman," the film that you could argue ushered in the modern age of big screen superheroes. But whether or not you agree with that idea, you can rest assured that you will almost certainly disagree with our rankings of all the Batman movies. Because that's just how these things go.
15. "Batman and Robin" (1949) is just an abysmal experience, with a bad lead actor wearing a floppy-eared Batsuit. Though The Wizard, a villain original to this serial, is admittedly cool looking, it's not enough to stem the boredom in this four-hour slog.
14. "Batman" (1943) gets points for novelty thanks to its hilariously over-the-top old fashioned World War II racism. But Batman's first onscreen appearance lacks pretty much everything that would mark it as an engaging filmgoing experience today. It's cool that a grandfather clock provides the entrance to the Batcave, though.
13. "Justice League" (2017) is just total nonsense, and unlike "Batman v Superman" can't even boast a good performance from Affleck as Bruce Wayne. And it doesn't have the decency to be enjoyably bad like "Batman and Robin" or "The Dark Knight Rises."
12. "Batman and Robin" (1997) is rightly hated, but it's tremendously entertaining here and there. Uma Thurman and Arnold Schwarzeneggar are going so far over the top I can't help but admire them.
11. "The Dark Knight Rises" (2012) probably wasn't intended to be a grim and gritty Shumacher Batmovie, but that is indeed what it is. This is Nolan going full Hollywood, smashing plot points into place by sheer force of will rather than because they make sense. An extremely theatrical Tom Hardy as Bane is amusing front to back, and a nuke with a countdown clock on it will never get old.
10. "Batman v Superman: The Dawn of Justice" (2016) is nearly saved by Ben Affleck going all-out as Bruce Wayne, but director Zack Snyder just couldn't keep his plot on track. There's too much ground to cover, and the movie is too unfocused to ever really cover any of it.
9. "Batman" (1989) is fondly remembered mostly because it was the first Batmovie in a couple decades. It isn't actually very good, though. The reveal that a younger version of the Joker killed Bruce Wayne's parents is as hamfistedly dumb as it gets in a "Batman" movie.
8. "Batman v Superman Ultimate Edition" does so much to improve the experience of watching it that it warrants its own entry -- it's basically a completely different move with all the important story beats and character moments it adds.
7. "Batman Forever" (1995) hits just the right tone for what Joel Shumacher was trying to do with the two films he directed. Tommy Lee Jones, as Two Face, is doing stuff in this movie that is hard to believe even today, given his perpetual sour face in nearly every other movie he's been in.
6. "Batman: Mask of the Phantasm" (1993) Remember that time they released a "Batman" cartoon theatrically? It gets lost amongst all the live-action ones, but "Mask of the Phantasm" is better than most of them.
5. "The Dark Knight" (2008) should be way shorter, but Heath Ledger's Joker is far and away the best villain in any of these movies. Ledger elevates what would otherwise be just another self-indulgent Christopher Nolan exercise into an endlessly watchable picture.
4. "The LEGO Batman Movie" (2017) is funny, sweet and self-deprecating -- exactly what we needed in the wake of the disaster that was "Batman v Superman."
3. "Batman Begins" (2005) is the most complete film, on its own, in the entire franchise. It's just, like, a regular movie except it's about Batman. It has actual characters and everything, and Christian Bale's Bruce Wayne even has emotions. It's weird.
2. "Batman Returns" (1992) is one of the best of the franchise because it's really just a political thriller. The Penguin emerges from the sewer and runs for mayor of Gotham! It's great stuff, especially now that Donald Trump is president.
1. "Batman: The Movie" (1966) has a timelessness that none of the other films do, and it's just a delight from beginning to end thanks to Adam West's winking Batman and the coalition of villains who can't stop cackling maniacally. Watching it again recently, I found it functions almost perfectly as a parody of the super-serious Christopher Nolan Batfilms, which is incredible.
1 of 16
Celebrate the anniversary of Tim Burton’s ”Batman“ by arguing about which Batman movie is the best
We've arrived at the 30th anniversary of the release of Tim Burton's "Batman," the film that you could argue ushered in the modern age of big screen superheroes. But whether or not you agree with that idea, you can rest assured that you will almost certainly disagree with our rankings of all the Batman movies. Because that's just how these things go.
