‘X-Men: Apocalypse’ Post-Credits Scene Explained: What Is Essex Corp?
Essex Corp — mentioned in the “X-Men: Apocalypse” post-credit — was meant to tease Mr. Sinister’s appearance in “Logan,” but James Mangold had other plans
Jeremy Fuster | May 26, 2016 @ 7:50 PM
Last Updated: March 13, 2017 @ 5:48 PM
Fox
(Spoiler Alert: Plot details from “X-Men: Apocalypse” are ahead)
Moviegoers who are well-versed in the “X-Men” mythos will recognize what the final shot in the post-credits teaser for “X-Men: Apocalypse” refers to, but casual fans may be whipping out their cellphones wondering what exactly the Essex Corporation is.
In the end scene, sharp-dressed men from the mysterious company are seen scooping up samples of Wolverine’s blood after the adamantium-laced mutant goes on a rampage. The samples are then placed into a briefcase with the name “ESSEX CORP” etched on the top. The name refers not to a group, but to a man: Nathaniel Essex. Or, as he’s better known as in the comics, Mr. Sinister.
Mr. Sinister was introduced by Marvel in the 1980s to provide the X-Men with a villain other than the usual suspects like Magneto and The Brotherhood. According to lore, Nathaniel Essex began as a Victorian-era scientist who was interested in delving into Darwin’s theory of evolution, and less interested in following those pesky rules known as scientific ethics and basic human decency.
Through his research, Essex uncovered both the secret of the mutants’ existence and the genetic process that gave them their powers. Unfortunately, the unethical experiments he proposed to further investigate these mutations caused him to be exiled by society. Bitter and resentful, Essex came across Apocalypse, who transformed him into the powerful and immortal mutant known as Mr. Sinister.
Along with the standard powers like super-strength and telekinesis, Mr. Sinister has the ability to implant the genes of other mutants into his own, allowing him to copy their powers. In the post-credits scene, we see Essex Corp agents taking vials containing blood from other mutants, not just Wolverine’s.
It’s possible that Essex wants the blood so he can take over Project Weapon X and make an army of mutants under his command, or use the samples to expand his own abilities. Either way, Essex is considered an authority on mutant genetics in the “X-Men” universe, even more than Professor Xavier. But while Xavier is noble, Essex is far more … sinister.
Director Bryan Singer said in the commentary track for “Apocalypse” that Sinister was going to be the villain for “Logan,” but as X-Men fans found out, James Mangold had other plans for the third and final Wolverine film. Still, the post-credits scene did have a connection to “Logan,” as producer Simon Kinberg confirmed that the DNA samples collected by Essex Corp in the scene ended up being the basis for the cloning program that gave birth to X-23, the girl that shares Wolverine’s powers.
It’s still possible that Sinister could also play a role in a future “X-Men” movie, possibly the solo Gambit spin-off that is currently in development. That’s because Mr. Sinister and Gambit have a long history together. In the comics, Gambit was employed by Essex, helping him recruit other mutants to his cause in exchange for help with controlling his increasingly unstable powers.
Regardless of what direction they take him, the “X-Men” franchise is about to move one of its most cerebral, scheming villains ever from the comics to the big screen. Considering the cold reception critics had to “Apocalypse,” this is a villain they definitely need to make work for the franchise to continue without the star power of Hugh Jackman, whose time in the series has now come to an end.
“X-Men: Apocalypse” hits theaters Friday, May 27.
Why Are 'X-Men' Movies So Inconsistent? (Photos)
While the Marvel Cinematic Universe has produced consistently strong films, Fox's "X-Men" series has had a far weaker hitting average. For every "X2" and "First Class," there's a "Last Stand" or an "Origins: Wolverine." With "X-Men: Apocalypse" getting a decidedly mixed reception since it opened May 27, it's time to look closer at Marvel's team of mutants and examine what isn't working. Here's our suggestions for what's wrong with "X-Men."
Timeline Jumps: Let's start with a continuity problem. There are decade-long gaps between the events of "First Class," "Days of Future Past," and "Apocalypse," but there's no indication in any of these films that the characters are aging. Professor X looks just as boyishly handsome in 1983 as he does in 1962. While "First Class" tied its plot into the Cuban Missile Crisis, "Apocalypse" doesn't use the '80s for anything but cultural cues.
Fox
Reduced Plot Impact: More importantly, these timeline jumps decrease the stakes for the films. Yes, Xavier is a pacifist, but shouldn't it have taken more than two decades and an apocalyptic threat for the X-Men to be formed? Shouldn't these characters have been affected more by being involved in the human-mutant conflict for so long? The time jumps in recent "X-Men" films feel arbitrary and eliminate the feeling that human-mutant relations are so strained they could break out into disaster at any given moment.
Fox
Xavier/Magneto Overload: The thematic core of the "X-Men" series is the philosophical conflict between Professor X and Magneto. It has been mined to great success since the series began, but now it's starting to become a crutch. How many times can Magneto's anguish and Xavier's futile attempts to save him be rehashed?
Fox
Magneto Death Toll: "Apocalypse" pushes it too far by having Magneto be responsible for the deaths of countless people. He's never held responsible for it because, once again, the X-Men "redeem" him so he can be available for future plots. By constantly going back to Magneto for pathos, the films have caused his once compelling tragic arc to go stale.
Fox
Franchise First: Rather than focus solely on being good on their own, "X-Men" films are now going out of their way to set up future films at the expense of a tight plot. For all its strengths, "Days of Future Past" has irrevocably messed up the timeline, retconning "bad" films like "Origins" and "The Last Stand" from continuity while creating huge plot holes in the good ones. It's part of an attempt to create a cinematic universe with all these films akin to what Disney has done with Marvel. Instead, the attempts to thread the Stewart/McKellen era with the McAvoy/Fassbender era has created a confusing overarching storyline that causes the films to clash instead of blend.
Fox
Pointless Wolverine Cameo: Another example of franchise building over plot is Wolverine's cameo in "Apocalypse." It advances the plot slightly, but is mainly there to get people hyped for Hugh Jackman's final film in the role due out next year. Wolverine is there because people expect him to be in an "X-Men" film, not because the story needs him.
Fox
Why are you even here?: At least Wolverine had some sort of purpose. Sometimes, these films include mutants simply for the sake of showing off their powers. Storm, once a prominent member of the series when played by Halle Berry, just takes up space in "Apocalypse." Deadpool's appearance in "Origins" was only for hype and ended up betraying that character's appeal by sealing his mouth shut midway through the film.
Fox
Deadpool: Speaking of Deadpool, the success of his spinoff film lampoons the tone that the main "X-Men" films still tend to adhere by. Long speeches about heroism and brooding, serious characters are so played out that films like "Deadpool" are satirizing them. Yet "X-Men" keeps plowing forward with that tone, only occasionally stopping to lighten the mood with characters like Quicksilver. "X-Men" has yet to consistently find the balance between light comedy and serious drama that the Marvel Cinematic Universe keeps managing to hit.
Fox
Getting left behind: When "X-Men" came out in 2000, it achieved success by being the first film to show a huge team of superheroes in live-action on a scale never seen before. Now that novelty has worn off, but "X-Men" hasn't done enough to keep up with the times.
Fox
Power Struggles: While films like "The Dark Knight" and "Iron Man" ruminated on the dangers of power and the struggle between hope and nihilism, "X-Men" kept banking on Wolverine's visceral appeal with "Origins."
Fox
Human Impact: While "Captain America: Civil War" drew attention to the unintended consequences of superhero fights and to the innocent people caught in the crossfire, recent X-Men films "Apocalypse" showed widespread destruction of cities, casually showing the deaths of millions of people from far away and only bringing the camera back down to Earth to show the mutants do battle after normal people got buried in the rubble.
Fox
Hollow Action Scenes: When "X-Men" focuses on the impact the events in their films affect individuals, we get great films like "First Class." When it tries to raise the stakes with hollow action scenes, widespread destruction, and promises of timeline-shaking consequences, it fails. Fox needs to abort the attempts to have a "cinematic universe" and simply focus on creating great stories that give meaning to every mutant that appears in an "X-Men" film.
Fox
1 of 13
The mutant franchise has created some gems, but a myriad of problems have led to a number of duds landing in theaters as well
While the Marvel Cinematic Universe has produced consistently strong films, Fox's "X-Men" series has had a far weaker hitting average. For every "X2" and "First Class," there's a "Last Stand" or an "Origins: Wolverine." With "X-Men: Apocalypse" getting a decidedly mixed reception since it opened May 27, it's time to look closer at Marvel's team of mutants and examine what isn't working. Here's our suggestions for what's wrong with "X-Men."
Fox
