Clint Eastwood’s ‘Richard Jewell’ Auditions for the Oscars at AFI Fest Premiere
The world premiere of Eastwood’s drama about the 1996 Olympic bombing in Atlanta won raves in some circles, but the film could face significant obstacles with awards voters
The 2019 AFI Fest may have lost its closing-night attraction on Wednesday when Apple pulled “The Banker” from its planned Thursday premiere, but one of the biggest attractions of this year’s lineup still took place on Wednesday, its penultimate night, with the world premiere of Clint Eastwood’s “Richard Jewell.”
And as with all big, previously unseen films that premiere this time of year — particularly if they premiere at an industry-heavy showcase like the AFI Fest — the question that hung in the air immediately after the credits rolled at the packed TCL Chinese Theatre was, “Is it an awards movie?”
The answer, I suppose, depends on whom you ask. As soon as the film ended, a handful of pundits and fans hit Twitter to declare that “Richard Jewell” had stormed into the Oscar race, particularly with supporting performances by Sam Rockwell and Kathy Bates and the title role by lesser-known actor Paul Walter Hauser.
But when 11:00 rolled around an hour later and the review embargo lifted, the critics were respectful but not as enthusiastic. TheWrap’s Robert Abele, for one, called it “regrettably uneven, a nightmare made ordinary, sometimes ham-fistedly so, and occasionally even eccentric.”
Certainly, “Richard Jewell” is solid mainstream filmmaking from a veteran who refuses to slow down. At the age of 89, Eastwood somehow remains one of our most reliably prolific directors. In this decade alone, he’s made eight movies, skipping 2012, 2013, 2015 and 2017 but making up for it by releasing two films in 2014 and two in 2018.
Those films include one undeniable blockbuster in “American Sniper,” which made more than $500 million worldwide; the sizeable hits “Sully” and “The Mule,” which earned $240 million and $175 million, respectively; and a string of films that didn’t do as well, including “J. Edgar,” “Jersey Boys” and “The 15:17 to Paris.”
And of his output in the decade, “American Sniper” was the only real awards movie, earning six Oscar nominations, including Best Picture. Otherwise, awards voters have tended not to be swayed by the recent work from one of the few directors to win Best Picture twice, for 1992’s “Unforgiven” and 2004’s “Million Dollar Baby.”
At the beginning of the AFI Fest premiere, Paul Walter Hauser referenced both those movies when he took the microphone and chided the audience for not being enthusiastic enough when Eastwood was introduced. “It was not near loud enough,” he said, “when the dude who made ‘Unforgiven’ and ‘Million Dollar Baby’ walked out!”
The audience dutifully cheered louder for Eastwood, but it’s far from assured that awards voters will be as welcoming. While Hauser is wonderful as Jewell, a hapless wannabe who even the movie seems to regard as comic fodder until suddenly he isn’t, the actor will be competing in a category in which he’ll have to supplant at least three people from this list: Joaquin Phoenix in “Joker,” Adam Driver in “Marriage Story,” Robert De Niro in “The Irishman,” Antonio Banderas in “Pain and Glory,” Leonardo DiCaprio in “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” Eddie Murphy in “Dolemite” and Jonathan Pryce in “The Two Popes.” That’s a tall order.
Bates might have a slightly easier task to slip into the Best Supporting Actress race, though her presence there is hardly assured. And Rockwell’s chances in Best Supporting Actor will be hurt by the fact that he’s up against a bevy of performances that could be considered co-leads: Brad Pitt in “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” Al Pacino in “The Irishman,” Tom Hanks in “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood,” Anthony Hopkins in “The Two Popes,” Willem Dafoe in “The Lighthouse” …
As for the movie itself, its awards chances may be tied to how well it does at the box office and whether it captures any of the enthusiasm that views and voters had for “American Sniper.” “Richard Jewell” is the story of a man falsely accused of the 1996 Olympic bombing in Atlanta, but it’s a measured, often quiet study of harassment and injustice that purposely moves slowly and doesn’t have a big ending. To some, that’ll be a strength; to others, a reason not to feel very passionate about the film.
Another tricky factor is how closely the film’s villains align with the current right-wing punching bags in Donald Trump’s America. Jon Hamm plays an FBI agent who routinely flouts the law in his investigation of Jewell, and Olivia Wilde plays a brash and vampy newspaper reporter who is such a caricature of the evil media that she’d be twirling a mustache if she had one.
Now, those concerns can easily be dismissed if “Richard Jewell” picks up an audience that finds its story engrossing. The crowd at the AFI Fest did, and by all reports so did a guild and press audience at the Harmony Gold theater at the same time on Wednesday.
But just as in the early days of the real Richard Jewell’s investigation, it’s hard to tell where this one will end up — though it’s safe to say that even if it doesn’t catch on with awards voters, Eastwood will be back before long to try again.
Clint Eastwood's 5 Worst and 5 Best Movies as a Director, From 'The Rookie' to 'Unforgiven' (Photos)
Ac Clint Eastwood celebrates his 90th birthday, we look back at the Oscar winner's highlights (and lowlights) as a filmmaker.
The Worst: "The Rookie" (1990)
In the wake of two small, personal movies ("Bird" and "White Hunter Black Heart"), Eastwood showed real rust copying the '80s vogue for brash buddy-cop movies: This one's just empty brutality, dumb jokes, thankless roles (poor Sonia Braga and Raul Julia), and hilariously awful thriller plotting. Eastwood seems bored playing another crusty lawman teamed with a newbie (Charlie Sheen), while the mayhem -- trashed bars, crashes, shootouts, explosions -- feels like the work of a caged genre icon lashing out.
Warner Bros.
"The Eiger Sanction" (1975)
A weird misfire for Eastwood, who's at a loss to make the cheesy espionage story work, and unconvincing on screen as an art professor-secret assassin in the Bond mold; he looks ready to burst out laughing having to do scenes with a cackling albino spymaster named "Dragon." (The less said about an African-American seducer named Jemima Brown the better.) Though the climactic mountain climbing sequence has its breathtaking moments, it's a clichéd slog till then.
"Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil" (1997)
Eastwood's atmospheric strengths and underappreciated directing of actors eluded him in realizing John Berendt's best-selling nonfiction book about a Savannah, Georgia murder trial. It's an overlong checklist affair of clunky scenes and colorful players, but with little of the lived-in eccentricity rendered in the book. Even the good performances -- namely, Kevin Spacey and as-herself Lady Chablis -- are winking wind-up toys rather than emblems of an exotic, enchanting place.
Warner Bros.
"Changeling" (2008)
A bizarre true story from the 1920s becomes discordant melodrama in Eastwood's meandering Angelina Jolie vehicle about a Los Angeles single mother's hellish ordeal trying to prove that the boy returned to her by the police isn't her missing son. Injustice, corruption and serial killing prove too much for the director's laconic style. It's three noir movies rolled into one draggy, blankly dark mess.
Warner Bros.
"Jersey Boys" (2014)
There are elements to admire in the unlikely match-up of Eastwood and a toe-tapping Broadway musical about the Four Seasons, namely a few performances, and a certain grim tinge to its tale of showbiz climbers. But mostly it feels, strangely, both rushed and listless, stuck between pleasing nostalgia fans and rooting out grit and discomfort wherever possible. It's also visually bland and clichéd about its emotions, two rare descriptors for an Eastwood movie.
Warner Bros.
And the 5 best, startng with...
5. "Bronco Billy" (1980)
Eastwood's foray into old-fashioned screwball comedy -- there's even a madcap heiress (Sondra Locke) -- is really his first attempt at tweaking his tough-guy image, and it's his sleeper masterpiece. Turning a ramshackle, cash-strapped wild west show run by convicts of all colors into a warmly funny vision of a be-who-you-want-to-be America, Eastwood serves up a conservative's vision of the country that's inclusive, patriotic, and able to laugh at itself.
4. "Letters From Iwo Jima" (2006)
After "Flags of Our Fathers," Eastwood explored the same battle from the Japanese perspective, and -- to many people's surprise -- in the Japanese language. The result is a potently human, unflinching, and deeply felt evocation of how battle is fury, but war is a shroud asphyxiating the soul. As it monochromatically slides from the crisp daylight of preparation to the woozy gloom of tunnels full of doomed soldiers, it becomes Eastwood's purest, least sentimental vision of his most longstanding themes.
Paramount
3. "The Outlaw Josey Wales" (1976)
Marked by Bruce Surtees' exquisite cinematography, Eastwood's post-Civil War vengeance saga -- in which a Missouri farmer (Eastwood) turns hunted renegade after Union soldiers slaughter his family -- becomes a sly episodic Western about the hard, bloody road to peace. Moving easily between action, melancholy and humor (Wales' spitting on people and dogs is the stain of war made darkly literal), it's Eastwood's first great exploration of violence's psychic toll.
2. "Million Dollar Baby" (2004)
A poor young female boxer (Hilary Swank) wants to fight. The trainer (Eastwood) reluctantly trains. Punches await, small, and huge. An unabashedly rich-in-feeling movie about toughness, sacrifice, regret, and life on one's own terms, it's Eastwood wrenching the boxing picture from the triumph-of-the-spirit treadmill and introducing it to the abyss. That doesn't mean there isn't verve, humor and sentiment -- its character interactions are fleet and jazz-like -- but its beautiful soul is in the shadows.
Warner Bros.
1. "Unforgiven" (1992)
Eastwood held on to screenwriter David Webb Peoples' revisionist Western until the time was right, and the result was an Oscar-bestowed turning point and his best movie. Evocatively, suspensefully detailing a desperate widower's reckoning with his savage past, it tracked powerfully as both a pungent deflating of merrily violent western myths and a scarily tense depiction of how, as Eastwood's killer tells a scared young man, "We all have it comin,' kid." By the end, each gunshot is Eastwood mercy-killing a genre he loves, and knocking us to our senses about bloody movie justice.
Warner Bros.
1 of 11
TheWrap critic Robert Abele rates the highlights and lowlights of the Oscar-winning filmmaker’s work
Ac Clint Eastwood celebrates his 90th birthday, we look back at the Oscar winner's highlights (and lowlights) as a filmmaker.