Michael Wolff: Dylan Farrow's Letter Accusing Woody Allen Is Just Publicity For Ronan And Mia

Michael Wolff: Dylan Farrow's Letter Accusing Woody Allen Is Just Publicity For Ronan And Mia

Getty Images

“The larger context for this rehashed scandal is not a pattern of abuse or the ongoing dysfunctions of a celebrated family but rather the demands of a publicity rollout”

Vanity Fair contributing editor Michael Wolff posted a column in The Guardian on Monday questioning the validity of Dylan Farrow's open letter in the New York Times detailing allegations of sexual abuse by Woody Allen, saying the family is merely staging a PR coup.

“The larger context for this rehashed scandal is not a pattern of abuse or the ongoing dysfunctions of a celebrated family but rather the demands of a publicity rollout,” Wolff sniped. “Twenty-one years after the event – all parties long quiet – a story is revived. It is an old scandal for a new generation.”

Wolff expressed his belief that Dylan's letter is a culmination of a several-months long campaign by Mia Farrow to celebritize herself and her son Ronan, who is a rising media star with a new show on MSNBC. He claims Allen was exonerated of the charges in 1992.

Read Also: Woody Allen Fires Back on Dylan Farrow Molestation Allegations: ‘Untrue, Disgraceful’

“The impetus seems to be to establish Mia Farrow as a celebrity activist worthy of the world stage, and, as well, to launch a public career for her son Ronan,” Wolff wrote.

Wolff goes on to accuse “Girls” star Lena Dunham of being an accessory to this alleged publicity campaign, doubting her sincerity when she sent a tweet of support to Dylan. The Newser editor-in-chief sees this as a type of Twitter quid-pro-quo.

“If you tweet for me; I'll tweet for you,” he writes. “Everybody is at work here. Everybody is someone else's instrument. Everybody is promoting something.”

  • Sarah Saks

    If, as Michael Wolff says, “Everybody is at work here. Everybody is someone else’s instrument. Everybody is promoting something,” then the logical conclusion to draw is that Michael Wolff is seeking to promote himself by writing this piece and taking this stand.

    • Caley McGuire

      Your logical solution is to shoot the messenger.

      • Sarah Saks

        He's not a messenger. He's not reporting a news story objectively, he is writing a “think piece” promoting his own spin on the story and therefore his own view publicizing himself. He has no relation to the story, he's not the alleged victim or the alleged perpetrator. He's just someone looking for attention.

        • scoov@!mal.comguest

          by your logic, you are seeking attention and looking to promote yourself by commenting on this story.

          • me,me,pick me

            um, hi!

          • wessexmom

            Well, you're without logical because Wolff gets paid for selling his opinions; She does not. And the more controversial he becomes the more money he stands to make in the future.

          • dfkj

            He doesn't need to sell anything. He gets paid anyway. He gets paid irrespective of his stance and he backed up his position with a lot of solid points unlike people on this thread. By your definition, all reporters are just out for pr.

        • wessexmom

          And he doesn't know anything more than we do about the inner feelings or motivations of this family. He must be in love with Woody Allen. That's the only possible explanation for his vehement defense.

          • Caley McGuire

            You're not the only one who is entitled to their opinion.

          • roshni

            And that's the point. It's only opinion– yours, Wolff's, etc, etc. The difference is that Wolff has been given an enormous megaphone to voice his uninformed, non-professional opinion, too vehement and emotional to be considered impartial and rational. How did that happen??

          • Caley McGuire

            Freedom of the press, maybe?

    • ty

      False equivalency and you full well know it

    • Brenda Harrah Fowlar

      WORD…otherwise known as being hypocritical. ;-)

  • gerry

    this is hideous. if my daughter told me she was molested, i wouldnt say “he said, she said”–i would find the guy. Now she's 28 and somehow she's still accused of lying? I wonder what Michael Wolff (whoever he is) would say if his child said she were molested. another PR move? only in the mind of a man completely obsessed with image and the superficial could this argument even be mande

    • boysenberry

      I always thought there was something off about this ugly little creep Woody Allen. I never liked his movies, they are mostly weird and creepy like he is.
      I believe the now young woman. Good for her to speak out. It must be so difficult for her.
      I wish the beady eyed, big nosed little monster would rot in jail, if not there, in He ll.!!!! Sooner or later karma will get him.
      What did Mia Farrow ever see in this creepy little guy.

      • Avril111

        my Aunty Sienna recently got a stunning red
        Nissan Maxima by working part time online… find out here now B­i­g­4­1­.­ℂ­o­m

      • Gloria

        What did Mia ever see in him? Woody Allen is an ugly little grimy creep. All you have to do is read the Judge's order that is posted on line and is against Woody Allen on every one of its 34 pages. It goes on and on. And in the stream of abuses, Mia Farrow is mentioned as trying so hard to hold on to him and barf, why?

        Yes I agree, good for Dylan for speaking up. Her actions may help some other child. However we as a people have a long way to go to eradicate pedophiles from our midst. Men are pigs. I'm sorry to say, but just watch TV and we no longer censor anything.

        And all the pedophiles and polygamists who also breed and adopt young girls for marriage would rather we not talk about any of it which is exactly why we should talk about it. There are a lot of young girls who need to be saved from their father's beds.

    • John Hurd

      I wonder if Michael Wolff (if he were a woman) would go behind a lover's back and keep having sex with an ex-husband (like Mia Farrow did with Frank Sinatra) and hide that from the lover (Farrow's lover was Allen) and then continue to keep secret for over twenty years that maybe their son was actually fathered by the ex-husband. And I wonder (but not too much) if Michael Wolff (as a woman) might be angry enough at the lover who left her for another to plant a lie in his daughter's mind that daddy molested her. One thing's for sure: Ronan Farrow went overnight from being an unknown to suddenly being a media celebrity with a high-paying cushy job and career. What's next, Dylan with a show of her own??

  • Michael Lang

    Wolff is a cliched NYC lib who believes that an “artist” like Allen are to be exempted from the normal standard of morality because thy are soooo “talented”. Hyocrites all.

    • Sarah Saks

      It isn't a matter of “lib” or conservative. Both liberals and conservatives are guilty nowadays of trying to promote themselves in the media.

      • Vader

        this is not about promotion in media, its about a sexual predator

        so show me a republican sexual predator that had cover from his peers and or the media

      • wessexmom

        And your point is…

    • wessexmom

      Mia Farrow is very liberal. This is not a liberal/conservative battle.

    • joao cesar

      Aren't those exempted Bill Cosby's roofie rapes, the army rapes and the Catholic priests?

    • Caley McGuire

      What's also typical is your form of ill-informed indignation. You have joined the ranks of internet clichés. Welcome.

  • Raven

    The man, appropriately named “Woody”, married his step-daughter. Hmm?

    I'm sorry Mr. Wolff, what was your point?

    Hollywood has always protected it's own. Pathetic hypocrites!

    • NotRogerAiles

      No, he didn't marry his stepdaughter. If you're going to be so outraged, try to be at least minimally informed.

      • Ana Bannana

        You are right she wasn't his step daughter, but he watched her grow up.

        • anthony

          doesn't mean he's a pedophile
          pedophiles like children, not grown ups

          • Sadiesays

            She was a mildly retarded virgin who had no inkling of the world. Close enough to child if you ask me. Plus, let's face it, leaving your long term partner for their much younger daughter is well, SOCIOPATHIC.?

          • anthony

            Actually she has a degree from Columbia university and speaks many languages. Nice one.

          • wessexmom

            Her accomplishments aren't in question. The inappropriateness of his advances are.

          • pop

            Oh, but it's ok to put Michael Wolff's motivation under scrutiny when the discussion is about Allen, Farrow, et al.

          • Zox

            Wrong. What's under scrutiny is whether there was molestation of 7 year old Dylan.

          • anthony

            someone just implied she was a retard so that's why i listed her accomplishments to show that your team is largely misinformed. Thank you for your valuable input to the conversation.

          • Guest

            But ya, go with sociopathic, or w/e label you like, still not a pedophile for sleeping with a 19 year old

          • wessexmom

            And sick, by any standards. It's so interesting that Allen's defenders do NOT defend his relationship with Soon Yi. All of them, even the rabid Mr. Wolff, have said it was inappropriate and reprehensible. So on what grounds are they defending him?!?
            Only he and Dylan know for certain what happened in that attack (where they did find his fingerprints) but we can all agree that having sex with Mia's teenage daughter was creepy and perverted, even if it was legal.

          • Gloria

            No it was criminal, never legal. The problem with the law is enforcement. Polygamists in Utah get away with breeding young girls for marriage to much older men and this case falls into line with that practice. There are laws against marriage with your own child, step, adopted, biological or implied, such as defined as a father figure in the home for more than six months. Those laws are not enforced. They are not enforced in Utah and they are not enforced wherever Woody Allen married his own daughter.

          • Gloria

            There was no diagnosis available on line as to whether or not Soon Li is mildly retarded, but that would explain so much.

            Mia Farrow is not all that bright as well. I mean, what was she thinking? Read the Judge's Order to find out about her role in all of this. She was ineffective way after her suspicions were confirmed. Many a woman would have handled this differently than she did and Woody should be so happy that she is so mild mannered and he was left to marry their daughter in peace.

            Wouldn't have went down that way in Texas.

          • wessexmom

            Women who BARELY meet the age of consent and cannot legally drink or even vote are not grownups! Grown middle-aged men who are repeatedly attracted to TEENAGERS are truly sick, perhaps legally sick, but sick nonetheless!

          • anthony

            Who gives a shit what you think is sick or not, it has nothing to do with pedophilia.

          • Gloria

            Apparently you do Anthony. I have been enjoying your comments the most of all because your defense of Woody Allen only strengthens your view of how you would like your own world to be.

          • Caley McGuire

            How's the weather up there?!

          • Gloria

            Do tell us Anthony, what age does a female human become an adult?

          • anthony

            being a pedophile means one has an attraction towards prepubescent girls, being a woman yourself, i hope you reached puberty by the time you were 17-19

        • joao cesar

          Funny that, I was just told ”but Sinatra wasn't her stepfather, even though she watched Mia grow up”

      • Laura-Jane Ratcliffe

        No, worse. She was his daughter for all intents and purposes. Add to that, Piers Morgan just interviewed a woman who dated Allen when he was 42. She was 17…17. What does a 17 have to enthrall a middle aged man, certainly not a wealth of life experience to share is it?.

        • boysenberry

          Shows you what a creep he is.

      • Gloria

        Actually, Soon Yi was a member of the household where Mia Farrow tried to implement Woody Allen as their father. Read the Judgment Order. I read it and this subject was addressed in full.

        Soon Yi was not excluded just because that makes it convenient for Woody Allen.

    • Brenda Harrah Fowlar

      Sun Yi was only 10 when Allen came on board…he was a parental figure for her…God only knows how long he had been molesting her behind Mia's back along with Dylan. Why are people having such a problem with the logistics…look at the pain and destruction he caused for the entire family!

  • ty

    false equivalency and you full well know it

  • poj

    I don't think Wolff is discounting the daughter's claims. He is making a separate point about impure motives of people around her, orchestrating it for their own self-serving interests.

    Mia Farrow and the brother have cast a seedy light on this in the way it's been handled . It is odd that there's silence for years and suddenly this is timed just as the brother is trying to roll out a show on the cable channel and clearly wants to become a media celebrity but has been getting no heat. They pulled that Sinatra stunt, and nobody cared. No coincidence the brother's interview with Miley Cyrus is being promoted just 2 days after the open letter. Anytime someone picks Twitter as their venue, it is suspect. Suddenly Mia Farrow is getting her tweets picked up by media, such as her tweet on Philip Seymour Hoffman. They couldn't get traction in their careers and probably hated that Allen was doing well. Wolff makes a good point about twitter quid pro quo with Dunham. It's all very tasteless for something so serious.

    • Sadiesays

      Ronan has a brilliant education, has done more in his life by the time he was 20 than any of us will ever even think of. He does not need publicity, he has paved a quite stable career for himself. Just read his bio and you will see he can pretty much succeed without this. Also the “Sinatra stunt”? I mean, look at him. In every picture. He is Sinatra all the way. Anyway, my response is mostly on your statement that he couldn't get traction on his career. The kid graduated from college at age 15 and had a law degree from Yale at 22. I don't think it's publicity more than the fact that he despises Allen.

      • wessexmom

        Amen!

      • poj

        You don't need to read his bio. It's irrelevant. What matters is what he's been doing now. He has been very actively promoting himself in the media, going on late night talk shows, doing interviews of tabloid pop stars, tweeting snark, pulling lame coy pr stunts about Frank Sinatra timed with the announcement of his talk show, and pushing his own talk show. The timing of this with his upcoming talk show and his just released tabloid interview with Miley Cyrus of all people (he's not interviewing humanitarians and rocket scientists) speaks volumes about motivation.

        • wessexmom

          Again, if you don't know what you're talking about, then you don't have anything to say that's worth listening to.

      • Patrick Doyle

        The saga of Ronan Farrow perfectly encapsulates how the elites maintain their unearned privileges in this country. Like GW Bush and Chelsea Clinton before him, Ronan was born on 3rd base, given a cushy (albeuit a tad early) ride through the Ivy League, and deposited onto home plate expecting everyone to marvel at his awesomeness. Law school was no different for him than soccer practice.

    • wessexmom

      Just like Wolff, you have absolutely no evidence to back up your comments. Mia and her son have spent years and logged serious mileage doing good around the world, toiling mostly in obscurity. Why would they suddenly be seized with the urge to reveal and relive their wounds in public? Because Ronan is getting a daytime slot on MSNBC? That's an absurd premise–His show will be a serious show covering serious (ie, unsexy) topics, not exactly the type destined to become a ratings hottie. A much more logical explanation for this family's outburst was that they are still seriously hurt and traumatized by Allen's betrayal and as such, found it excruciating to see him bask in the blind adulation of Hollywood hypocrites.
      Your accusation is what's tasteless.

      • poj

        Spare the faux outrage. Going on Jimmy Fallon and begging for Twitter followers and chasing around twerking teeny boppers is hardly serious journalism or tasteful. All coinciding with the rehashing of this scandal.

      • pojoj

        interesting that you demand evidence only when it suits your own purpose

        wolff is not conducting a criminal trial, yet for an actual criminal matter you're just fine with no evidence.

        • wessexmom

          Actually, the Connecticut prosecutor in the case felt that Allen WAS guilty and that there WAS enough evidence to proceed with a trial but decided not to, in order to spare Dylan the trauma of such a public trial at her young age. You would know about this if you knew anything about the case.

          Wolff IS conducting a trial online yet he has no real basis for making such insensitive accusations. He doesn't know anymore than anyone else about this young woman's feelings or this family's motives. It's outrageous!

  • Steven Kaye

    Yes! Someone finally calling out the Farrows for the scum they are!

    • Vader

      speaking of scum…your it

    • Casey Charles

      Wow, you seem to be an expert of scums!!! Must be in your blood!!!

  • Lar5

    Wonder what happens now to Ronan's new show on MSNBC? This publicity has him and his family looking like a target for tabloid fodder

  • Boycott Woody Allen

    Why do so many people defend Woody Allen? If I recall these same Allen lovers think rapist Roman Polanski is a genius!?! A crime was swept under the rug and a child's life torn to bits. Wake up world, Woody Allen is a child molester!

    • Laura-Jane Ratcliffe

      Because no one ever wants to believe they know, or know of, a person who could do such despicable acts. Denial is a way of coping with something the brain cannot comprehend. Most adults of today have grown up “knowing” Allen so there is a familiarity there. Its the same as when someone discovers their neighbour is a murderer and they say “but he seemed like such a nice person”. Just cannot comprehend.

      • Gloria

        Or they themselves are pedophiles and little frail Woody Allen looks like he needs a protector. See, if Woody can get away with this, and indeed he did and now he is whining because his bad deeds are back in the light and all of this is understandable after all the accolades he recently received. Kuddos to Dylan for speaking up for herself.

        Who cares who gets publicity. We don't have Oprah anymore, and someone needs to be talking about this. There are a lot of pedophiles among us.

        All you have to do is read through any of these boards to find them. Not one of these defenders has actually took the time to read the 34 page judgment order against Woody Allen and most of these guys wouldn't understand it if they did read it, so good luck having an honest discussion of points of law.

        The evidence is overwhelming.

  • Vader

    just watched this turd ball “journalist” on Piers.

    yes, its totally normal for men to watch little kids grow up from the age of 8, and then start sexually pursuing them at 17/18 years old

    make sure him and the rest have a proper obituary as “pedophile defender”

  • http://www.carmellestreasures.com/ Carmelle Simone

    Mike Wolff is an attention-wh***. He's dispicable on this CNN roundtable. Quite insulting indeed.

  • T Carey

    It's views like Michael Wolff's that perpetuate abuse against children. It is reminisant of the Catholic priests who didn't abuse the children themselves, but covered it up only to allow more abuse.
    Mr. Wolff, you are way off base on this one.

  • Prison for Woody

    This hack Wolff was last heard peddling the lie that Rupert Murdoch's marriage was broken up by an affair between his wife and Tony Blair. He peddles the worst gossip imaginable.
    Have you noticed it's only Jewish people like Wolff, Barbara Walters and Jewish Hollywood defending Jewish Allen? Hollywood turned a blind eye to the Jewish perverts Polanski and Allen, and kept heaping awards on them, so they could get financing and overcome the public's boycott of these perverts. Michael Jackson was treated a lot worse than those two, even though he was as talented, probably more, no one was throwing awards at him after child molestation allegations, like these two have had.

    • pez

      Screw you. Condemning child abuse with demented anti-Semitic rantings? And if you bothered to check, Polanski's defenders were mostly non-Jewish. Michael Jackson has nothing to do with anything except perhaps your comment is a false flag for your racial agenda. But as you recall he had backing for a huge comeback but deteriorated because he was a drug addict and mental. He didn't have “awards” because he stopped working. But it's sick that your message is child molesters should all have a free pass and get equal awards.

  • mike

    I was watching this ball headed douche bag on Piers & 2 things occurred to me! 1st off this guy wants love from Hollywood & other powerful Liberals! 2cnd I hate both of those guys! How dare he calls a woman accuses a piece of shit Actor/Director of years of abuse & call her a liar! The man defended Allen Marrying his adopted daughter! It's a sick ass move by a demented mind!
    If I watched a young girl I adopted from age 8 I would not think hey lets marry! What douche bag for his defense of a predator

  • David Ward

    Michael Wolff bares a remarkable resembalance to Dr. Evil

    • wessexmom

      Or the head and face of an eel. I guess ugly men have to stick up for each other!

      • pop

        people like you freak me out

        you can seem normal and mature in one comment but then the crazy starts to leak out in each subsequent comment

  • wessexmom

    Michael Wolff was outrageous tonight on AC 360 Later, screaming at people at the top of his lungs that they don't know what they're talking about, as if he
    does! He doesn't “know” anything more than we do about the inner
    feelings and motivations of Dylan Farrow and her family.

    Here is what I would say to Mr Wolff:
    WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR YOUR BASELESS ACCUSATIONS?!?!
    To charge this young woman and her family of cooking up a publicity stunt
    to coincide with the launch of Ronan Farrow's MSNBC daytime show is both
    ludicrous and despicable. Why would they have kept quite all these
    years? Because they plotted years and years ago that in 2014 Ronan would
    get a daytime slot on MSNBC? That's akin to saying Obama's parents
    conspired to hide his real birth place because they knew when he was
    born that he would be president 40 something years later!

    Perhaps Mr. Wolff is just out of his mind with jealousy. Ronan Farrow, after all,
    is brilliant (He attended college at 11 and Yale Law at 16 before going on to becoming a Rhodes scholar). He's also movie-star gorgeous and only 26 years old. Mr. Wolff, on the other hand, could give Bond villains serious competition and Woody Allen looks like a knarly old bespeckled elf. I guess ugly men have to stick up for each other!

    • robinkilgore

      What about Dylan, Mia, and Ronan Farrow's “baseless accusations” and why don't you appear to know that this was a big deal clear back in 1992, over 20 years ago, and that the professionals involved in the case found the accusations all the way back then , lacking in credibility? That was why there were never any charges filed and Mr. Allen was exonerated in the public eye.
      Now, almost a quarter of a century later the Farrow clan, for their own selfish purposes, are vilifying and victimizing Mr. Allen all over again….and this after he supported them financially all through their lives and never showed them anything but love and concern.
      Real classy, huh ?
      Google and watch Woody Allen's 1992 interview on 60 Minutes that was done during this time and get a fresh perspective.

  • Casey Charles

    A father, be it foster or biological, raises up his daughter from the age of 8 to 18 and proceeds to have sexual relations with her is just simply put, abnormal and what we normal people call disgusting. It's like anyone can adopt a daughter and await for them to grow up so that they can marry them??? WTF??? One does not just turn 18 and magically gain sexual feelings for her father for 10 years, in an instant. Feelings of love come from years of experience. That would only mean that Woody Allen and Soon Yi was probably having an affair be it sexual or not, even before she was 18. Dylan Farrow's claims doesn't sound like a publicity stunt but more like a cry out for all victims of as such abuses to voice out against these sexual predators. Shame on all who claim this to be a publicity stunt.

    • poj

      No one said Dylan Farrow was doing this for publicity. Those around her have orchestrated the resurrection of this story for their own publicity.

    • James

      Woody Allen was never Soon Yi's father or step father. He was the boyfriend of her adopted mother. He and Mia Farrow never lived together, nor did he spend night's at her house. So please get your facts straight.

    • Damn-Deal-Done

      Wrong. Mia and Soon-yi both have even said that Woody had no relationship before Mia forced Woody to start spending time with her. He had literally no relationship with her until she was a consenting adult. Do you feel good for making stuff up and spreading it?

    • robinkilgore

      Get your facts straight and quit drinking the ‘kool-aid'.
      Woody Allen did not raise Mia Farrow's and Andre Previn's adopted daughter. He didn't even live in the same house. He maintained his own residence throughout the years that he dated, and never married, Mia Farrow. Btw, Soon-Yi previn was nearly 20 when she began her relationship with Woody Allen and, after more than 5 years and after completing her college education in another state, she married Woody Allen and they have been happily married with 2 adopted children of their own, for nearly 2 decades.
      Why do so many uninformed idiots want to rain on their parade ?

  • Peter Combs

    What an idiot…in 1992 the State of Connecticut had “Probable cause” to indict Allen but opted not to because of the damage it would cause to a 7 year old…she would have been annihilated by such an event. Hollywood would have pulled out ALL the stops, just as they did to defend Polanski who Allen defended over the years as well…

    • robinkilgore

      They didn't have “probable cause”. What they had was the confirmation by the child abuse professionals that interview and examined Dylan Farrow and found her lacking in credibility, inconsistent, and as they determined , likely to have been coached by her mother.

  • Up and Over

    I think Mia Farrow, who is so vengeful, and butt-hurt over being dumped 20 years ago, has put all this BS into the kids minds. I don't believe a word of it. I think she is a sick woman who needs professional help. That's MY opinion.

  • Patrick Doyle

    Interesting conincidence – Ronan Farrow appears on Real Time with Bill Maher on Friday, Dylan's piece runs in NYT on Sunday. I'm no Perez Hilton but I read the lefty blogs voraciously, and I never heard of Ronan Farrow before Friday night.

  • bluefish

    Wolff has no way of backing up any of his claims here. None of the folks involved in this all too public mess have anyway it appears of proving anything. Why the country has to suffer through this mess in this way is really confounding. I wish Dylan Farrow had had the good sense to pursue this differently. Right now, it appears to be working for her but this story seems far from over and I fear for her well-being. These is something repulsive about both Mia and Woody — I can't imagine what the other children are feeling right about now. I doubt that anything of lasting value will come of this sordid mess. Pressing through at the time and taking it to court would have been the way to go — Dredging it all up again now, two decades later, and using the NYTs to air your dirty laundry — not for me.

    • robinkilgore

      The allegation by Dylan at age 7 was pursued , in every possible way, at the time and found to be lacking in credibility. Child psychologists, a doctor, and law enforcement did a thorough examination at the time and found no reason to pursue it further and closed the book on it.
      Now , over 2 decades later, Dylan , Mia, and the publicity-hungry Ronan Farrow have decided to throw these pernicious and libelous stones at Woody Allen again .
      Sadly, people LOVE scandal and they've responded to this very old, and already closed chapter in Woody Allen's life so that they can pile on with an unfounded lynch-mob mentality.
      Ronan's career will last all of 15 minutes that he deserves.

  • Damn-Deal-Done

    You forget that Mia broke up Andre and Doly Previn which caused a lot of problems for Doly. Doly Previn wrote the song Beware of Young Girls about Mia. On the same record is the song ‘With My Daddy in the Attic'. Is this a coincidence? of course not. The language of the tweets during the awards ceremony were also very telling. Neither Ronan or Mia used the words sister of daughter or her name. They said ‘A Women’ has accused him of molesting her. This to me is a clear sign of a planned and synchronised sham. They wanted it to seem as if it was coming from a stranger as well as allow for more
    imagination room in the minds of the readers, a new women? a new accusation? a recent molestation? to people less incluined to look up the details, the damage to Woody Allen is done. The whole thing is a massive lie perpetrated by Mia and her two brainwashed children.

    • robinkilgore

      Exactly ! and why hasn't Mia been hung out to dry for destroying Dory Previn's marriage by getting pregnant by Dory's then husband, Andre Previn
      Such hypocrisy !

  • robinkilgore

    And google Woody Allen's 1992 interview on 60 MINUTES for an in-depth view of what really happened and why.

  • Naomi

    Michael Wolff is just projecting who he really is onto Dylan and Ronan. It is Michael Wolff who is using the situation with Dylan and Woody for publicity, desperately seeking his fifteen minutes of fame. Michael just wants to rile people, because clearly he has some kind of personality disorder, where even negative attention is better than none.
    Sadly, for Michael Wolff, he isn't going to get very far in life, and no one will take much notice of him, because he can't write, analyse, empathise, or offer anything very much at all to humanity.

  • alex rater

    Let me take a wild guess, Michael Wolff is jewish. They are out in force trying to defend one of their own. Never mind that the creep is likely a pedophile!