J.K. Rowling Fires Back After Critic Says ‘It Should’ve Been You’ on Her Dolly Parton Tribute

The “Harry Potter” author, whose anti-trans views continue to spark controversy, praised the late singer as an “irreplaceable one-off”

JK Rowling
J.K. Rowling arrives at the "Fantastic Beasts: The Secret of Dumbledore" world premiere at The Royal Festival Hall on March 29, 2022 in London, England. (Photo by Stuart C. Wilson/Getty Images)
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready…

J.K. Rowling fired back after a critic commented, “It should have been you,” on her tribute to Dolly Parton, calling out the post for publicly “wishing death” on her.

Earlier on Tuesday, the “Harry Potter” author, whose anti-trans views have made her a controversial figure, took to X to pay tribute to the late country legend, who died at 80 following a brief battle with cancer. Like many in the industry, Rowling had nothing but praise for the singer, actress and philanthropist, writing, “Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library was the best contribution to child literacy ever made by a celebrity. Our paths crossed once, in the ’90s, backstage at a talk show, and I was completely tongue-tied and starstruck. RIP Dolly. You were a complete, irreplaceable one-off.”

However, given Parton’s prior status as a devoted advocate for the LGBTQ+ community, many on X took umbrage with Rowling’s message about the “9 to 5” star.

One scathing response appeared to catch Rowling’s attention, as she shared the comment with her followers: “It should have been you.”

“Top tips for wishing death on people in public,” the author wrote alongside a screenshot of the critic’s message. “Blocking the target is useless if you’ve signposted your real name and university in your bio.”

This wasn’t the only negative comment Rowling called out on X, however. For instance, one user wrote on Tuesday, “You know you and Dolly have nothing to agree upon, you f–king monster.” To which Rowling replied, “Well, joke’s on you, because neither of us want Jolene to take our man,” referencing Parton’s 1973 anthem.

Additionally, after a different X user tried to suggest that Parton was a supporter of Donald Trump, Rowling hit back with, “Oh, do f–k off. At a conservative estimate, Dolly Parton was 100,000x the person you are.”

Rowling was far from the only celebrity to pay tribute to Parton on Tuesday. The country superstar saw tributes from across industries, receiving heartfelt homages from the likes of Taylor Swift, Beyoncé, Jeff Bezos, Carol Burnett, Jane Fonda, Lily Tomlin, Eminem, Bill Clinton and Tim Cook.

Across the many tributes, Parton was remembered as a remarkable talent, generous spirit and dedicated friend.

Please wait while we verify your access…

Comments

  1. Amber Borczynski Avatar
    Amber Borczynski

    Instead of attacking someone because they are posting a kind tribute to someone who did a lot of good in the world, consider this. We can have respect for someone whose thoughts and opinions differ from ours. It’s called having an open mind. It is a good thing to see and notice the strength found in others that we may lack in ourselves. It’s called growth. No one can speak on behalf of the deceased, because that individual cannot confirm or deny whether they support the thoughts and actions of the one speaking. Being offended is a choice. Reacting to someone’s comments or opinions is an action of that choice. When we become offended because of the words of someone else, the only one offended is us. Instead of creating controversy, perhaps ask yourself why you are choosing to be offended. How does what is being discussed impact your life? If it doesn’t, be an adult and move on. If by some chance it does, ask for clarification before attacking another person for their opinion. Opinions aren’t truth, but how someone feels, and they are entitled to that, as are you. Arguments come from misunderstandings and miscommunication. In this instance, an author was praising the actions of a wonderful singer and philanthropist, and others made a kind tribute ugly. What is the point of that? People and their contributions to the world are allowed to be missed, even by people who may not normally come together as friends. People dishonor her memory by turning her tributes into battle grounds. I find that almost as sad as the loss of this talented woman. If we can’t be kind, we shouldn’t respond. It adds nothing of value to her legacy or accomplishments.